Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261937AbUCQScK (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Mar 2004 13:32:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261938AbUCQScK (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Mar 2004 13:32:10 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:27100 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261937AbUCQScH (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Mar 2004 13:32:07 -0500 Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:32:10 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Jan Kara Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Quota locking Message-Id: <20040317103210.3d074eb7.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040317175643.GA25337@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> References: <20040317175643.GA25337@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 876 Lines: 23 Jan Kara wrote: > > I've extracted the locking changes from journalled quota patch > relevant for vanilla kernel (basically fixes the lock ordering in some > cases). The patch also includes documentation of the quota locking. Sure, I'll queue that up. It breaks the journalled quota patches of course, so I dropped those. Is the same code as was in the journalled quota patch? If so, it's reasonably well tested. I assume you'll be reworking the ext3 journalled quota patches? > The patch is not trivial so are you willing to accept it in the vanilla > kernel? Sure. Probably soon after 2.6.5 is released? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/