Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In-Reply-To: <20190226223429.193873-1-sboyd@kernel.org>
To:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Rewrite clk parent handling
Message-ID: <155148755222.16805.14783532568007890826@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
References: <20190226223429.193873-1-sboyd@kernel.org>
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
User-Agent: alot/0.8
Date:   Fri, 01 Mar 2019 16:45:52 -0800
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Quoting Stephen Boyd (2019-02-26 14:34:21)
>=20
> I plan to at least merge the early patches in this series into clk-next
> so we can clear the way for the later patches. I don't think anything is
> too controversial until we get to the new way of specifying parents
> at the end and of course, the sdm845 patch is incomplete so it's not
> going to be merged.

I've pushed the first 5 to clk-next.=20