Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sat, 2 Mar 2019 17:23:41 -0500
From:   Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
To:     Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc:     Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
        Vlad Buslov <vladbu@mellanox.com>,
        "kernel-team@fb.com" <kernel-team@fb.com>,
        "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] percpu: do not search past bitmap when allocating
 an area
Message-ID: <20190302222341.GA1196@dennisz-mbp.home>
References: <20190228021839.55779-1-dennis@kernel.org>
 <20190228021839.55779-3-dennis@kernel.org>
 <AM0PR04MB4481E8B4E51EB7FCFA72ABF088770@AM0PR04MB4481.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR04MB4481E8B4E51EB7FCFA72ABF088770@AM0PR04MB4481.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 01:32:04PM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> Hi Dennis,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org [mailto:owner-linux-mm@kvack.org] On
> > Behalf Of Dennis Zhou
> > Sent: 2019年2月28日 10:18
> > To: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>; Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>; Christoph
> > Lameter <cl@linux.com>
> > Cc: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@mellanox.com>; kernel-team@fb.com;
> > linux-mm@kvack.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: [PATCH 02/12] percpu: do not search past bitmap when allocating an
> > area
> > 
> > pcpu_find_block_fit() guarantees that a fit is found within
> > PCPU_BITMAP_BLOCK_BITS. Iteration is used to determine the first fit as it
> > compares against the block's contig_hint. This can lead to incorrectly scanning
> > past the end of the bitmap. The behavior was okay given the check after for
> > bit_off >= end and the correctness of the hints from pcpu_find_block_fit().
> > 
> > This patch fixes this by bounding the end offset by the number of bits in a
> > chunk.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  mm/percpu.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
> > index 53bd79a617b1..69ca51d238b5 100644
> > --- a/mm/percpu.c
> > +++ b/mm/percpu.c
> > @@ -988,7 +988,8 @@ static int pcpu_alloc_area(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk,
> > int alloc_bits,
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Search to find a fit.
> >  	 */
> > -	end = start + alloc_bits + PCPU_BITMAP_BLOCK_BITS;
> > +	end = min_t(int, start + alloc_bits + PCPU_BITMAP_BLOCK_BITS,
> > +		    pcpu_chunk_map_bits(chunk));
> >  	bit_off = bitmap_find_next_zero_area(chunk->alloc_map, end, start,
> >  					     alloc_bits, align_mask);
> >  	if (bit_off >= end)
> > --
> 
> From pcpu_alloc_area itself, I think this is correct to avoid bitmap_find_next_zero_area
> scan past the boundaries of alloc_map, so
> 
> Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> 
> There are a few points I did not understand well,
> Per understanding pcpu_find_block_fit is to find the first bit off in a chunk which could satisfy
> the bits allocation, so bits might be larger than PCPU_BITMAP_BLOCK_BITS. And if
> pcpu_find_block_fit returns a good off, it means there is a area in the chunk could satisfy
> the bits allocation, then the following pcpu_alloc_area will not scan past the boundaries of
> alloc_map, right?
> 

pcpu_find_block_fit() finds the chunk offset corresponding to the block
that will be able to fit the chunk. Allocations are done by first fit,
so scanning begins from the first_free of a block. Because the hints are
always accurate, you never fail to find a fit in pcpu_alloc_area() if
pcpu_find_block_fit() gives you an offset. This means you never scan
past the end anyway.

Thanks,
Dennis