Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262378AbUCRDT4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:19:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262384AbUCRDTz (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:19:55 -0500 Received: from bhhdoa.org.au ([216.17.101.199]:13064 "EHLO bhhdoa.org.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262378AbUCRDTx (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Mar 2004 22:19:53 -0500 Message-ID: <1079581101.405919ade7af9@vds.kolivas.org> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:38:21 +1100 From: Con Kolivas To: Andrew Morton Cc: Kurt Garloff , hch@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: dynamic sched timeslices References: <20040315224201.GX4452@tpkurt.garloff.de> <200403170013.38140.kernel@kolivas.org> <20040316142957.GX4452@tpkurt.garloff.de> <200403170745.02538.kernel@kolivas.org> <20040318002027.GO20121@tpkurt.garloff.de> <20040317163214.16c943c5.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040317163214.16c943c5.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1444 Lines: 38 Quoting Andrew Morton : > Kurt Garloff wrote: > > > > Hi Con, > > > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 07:45:02AM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote: > > > > That's why I think we should offer the tunables. > > > > > > If your workload is so dedicated to just number crunching it isn't hard > to add > > > a zero to maximum timeslice in kernel/sced.c. > > > > Of course I can compile a custom kernel for myself and tune all sorts of > > things. But this is not the way most Linux users want to use Linux any > > more. Actually that's a long time ago. > > > > I don't think we should be averse to offering a couple of nice high-level > scheduler tunables. But I do think we should have testing results which > clearly show that they provide some benefit, and we should agree that the > scheduler cannot provide the same benefit automagically. > > Apologies in advance if we've seen those testing results and I missed it. Well that reply takes my message out of context. I'm not averse to tunables - if they do something. The only evidence Kurt has shown so far is that he can decrease throughput. The rest is theoretical based on a scheduler that isn't the 2.6 kernel. Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/