Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <155136980507.2968.15165201054223875356.stgit@devbox> <20190303173954.kliegojbuigqi5tn@inn2.lkp.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190303173954.kliegojbuigqi5tn@inn2.lkp.intel.com>
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Sun, 3 Mar 2019 11:53:58 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wij8VLupHh1U-fFhFBjin9Fch3mG2_2=aL9h1L+WBvm2g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [uaccess] 780464aed0: WARNING:at_arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h:#strnlen_user/0x
To:     kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
        Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
        Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>, yhs@fb.com, lkp@01.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Mar 3, 2019 at 9:40 AM kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
>
> commit: 780464aed08ad00aa6d5f81ac8bef2e714dc8b06 ("[PATCH v5 2/6] uaccess: Use user_access_ok() in user_access_begin()")

Hmm. Not an upstream commit ID, so this is presumably a backport.

Ok, let's see what it is using the web link:

> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Masami-Hiramatsu/tracing-probes-uaccess-Add-support-user-space-access/20190303-203749

Yeah, that just gives a github 404 error.

I'm _assuming_ it's the WARN_ON_IN_IRQ() in the access_ok().

Which doesn't much make sense either (why wouldn't it happen in
mainline)? But without a useful web link to see what is actually being
tested, I guess it's not something I can even look at...

                      Linus