Received: by 2002:ac0:aed5:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id t21csp2603629imb; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 09:12:06 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3Iawyq6QAkKFkXvFuCnFkHUcG2ZYywl/lopdMXO9cJ7EmGFTOuT/hP8Xk0qH+g9cuNu1UmR1 X-Received: by 2002:a62:6f06:: with SMTP id k6mr20681906pfc.257.1551719526729; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 09:12:06 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1551719526; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UHlaAUptyaBs8cTz0y1U1mgQUXiLghoHSSZwglf7/0k1FxU5TVpl7TFoGK9DT6dZsX 7vmCDOE/P3juVpguEzmP7xjNoLxyAnD62tFNUwPHgs1p1GKueSRuNHDrRK/Z+N/hN9jQ sJyYD402O9A1EXylLmgIKRd72chLEErk5YbgoujqT+U7EdI1xCXs/HUdAHCJiIPhUq2F EPmF7gfi+4vKBete10RyhXxTyAA0uUrV7BXMUxnisryBEgaq0uvpJB+0+UUi8UA59hpE HvVib4AQ+Trc0V/rBfg1eFwB4oY7igw4Un/45kjxwO9ZWMKQfjvEECteexQ+5ubhBUqZ mufg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject; bh=3lGh9ULM9ub6I/Tv7Vt8lKSkl3Oe5Ipflf+F0721JTQ=; b=R4mgYvh8WN1RzTtIZF9mcEYATPceVuNu63xlbqOh8U3KdGBV1HfPLmLFTiNF3y6kkO 5kI4l4kC2ovJUh86ZRSXUH2d9CAbNJM914kJJJkdTd3cFS7td4+qsoXnOVruYguOElB0 KObVOrr1cMT7vrVumqoDQ+CJOBW91RvjoXnfipoJHj7+gnRKLC4/vgocVEN3Aqk5zkya ENVfIHovMUEIqnRaQwpluZKGhCV5sGubAU2u8YV9WDnPAdOwQduulfetVccnWdid/ytC JWLnHjo5KvLsG7CfpfOBnOZ0evho2AFZbPfBrazBHgHfLG8PAqi4qffk3zZGSARuLuct VXuw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 16si5733865pga.351.2019.03.04.09.11.51; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 09:12:06 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727100AbfCDQtg (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 4 Mar 2019 11:49:36 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:34184 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726063AbfCDQtg (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Mar 2019 11:49:36 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x24GkSe0020646 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 11:49:34 -0500 Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2r157vr36y-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 11:49:34 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 16:49:32 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195) by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 4 Mar 2019 16:49:28 -0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x24GnR8i58785998 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 4 Mar 2019 16:49:28 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D80AB4C040; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 16:49:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED0BE4C04A; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 16:49:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.80.93.84]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 16:49:26 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: Move kernel_read_file() to fs/read_write.c From: Mimi Zohar To: David Howells Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2019 11:49:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: <12096.1551716540@warthog.procyon.org.uk> References: <1551715930.10911.468.camel@linux.ibm.com> <155171231301.4764.5429281379303710262.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <12096.1551716540@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19030416-0016-0000-0000-0000025DAEDB X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19030416-0017-0000-0000-000032B82D2E Message-Id: <1551718156.10911.473.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-03-04_07:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1903040122 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2019-03-04 at 16:22 +0000, David Howells wrote: > Mimi Zohar wrote: > > > > Move kernel_read_file() to fs/read_write.c and out of fs/exec.c as it's not > > > actually used by anything in the execve subsystem. > > > > All files being opened by the kernel should be calling one of these > > helper routines.  Has that changed? > > prepare_binprm() uses kernel_read() and has done since at least 2014. The > binfmt drivers also use kernel_read(). > > Since kernel_read_file() is used by a bunch of things that aren't exec, even > if we switch exec to it, it should probably still go in fs/read_write.c since > it seems generic. Oh, commit bdd1d2d3d251 ("fs: fix kernel_read prototype") moved kernel_read() to fs/read_write.c without moving the helpers.  Definitely makes sense to move the helpers.  Please include a reference to the commit in this patch.  Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar