Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S130317AbRDCSDt>; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 14:03:49 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S132399AbRDCSDj>; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 14:03:39 -0400
Received: from [209.81.55.6] ([209.81.55.6]:53260 "EHLO cyclades.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S130317AbRDCSDd>;
	Tue, 3 Apr 2001 14:03:33 -0400
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 11:00:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ivan Passos <lists@cyclades.com>
To: Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
cc: Linux PPP List <linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: MLPPP in kernels 2.2.x w/ PPP v2.4.1
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0104031042540.25537-100000@intra.cyclades.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


Hello, everyone,

The quick question: if I install PPP 2.4.1 in a Linux box w/ kernel 2.2.x,
will I have support to MLPPP??

Now, the explanation for my doubt. I've seen several (actually 3)
different MLPPP implementations for older versions of PPP/pppd (namely
2.3.5 and 2.3.11). I'd like to know if once I install PPP 2.4.1 in a
system w/ kernel 2.2.x, I kill my need for these kind of patches in order
to support MLPPP. Or would I still need some kind of patch, even for PPP
2.4.1, to have MLPPP support in kernels 2.2.x??

I know that for kernels 2.4.x these patches are not needed.

Thanks in advance for your help!

Later,
Ivan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/