Received: by 2002:ac0:aed5:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id t21csp3016373imb; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 21:51:19 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyaIO2Q8OJW9ZxnHJP3wjt1xPfIOecW0jIr1e8HqL1bDxWwL6CxVgaCS1nswCI0h5TO06mV X-Received: by 2002:aa7:91d7:: with SMTP id z23mr161807pfa.137.1551765079818; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 21:51:19 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1551765079; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Nu2COP/lALJM0EAE5m5WlGcPCB2dpQr8N+iZF1nE0dAvllWrMyggqLDo7nF96esTqY +2Q2cAv8S4LdNGj8Mnk0I5oqcCw3H5FRID1at3q010E3P7hMdavlz0OK6TP+eRoUlqUU uB63CD/qrE+DqYk1/kI94fXd/EqasNv93pj6ffwhlgSyi8ux/djwxxCvFxQmUQoWFJsU 7BDxHJshlyFIskZma8gxG31mAINHFB4FRAkKJDwMvyX5V6YBDsq9ifPe6zCes2tNTCqB r99FkYf82uQ0xsJ/V1y5hCZjiWuoKsVW24amL2k/cQUzWioTmymS0SwwTmiKUzmrcCJE rZzg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=2Z4zC4JMB8QqRP9jnSdGQyStHfETHMwGh2iobtQ8htw=; b=Ht/ujBcECh4OdJZPUWweMvwpyJcv0fPkr6Sq2CSCyMKvGlvzr38bwjVsekq1SRdfKo fsAFTijjxgCgmWDhza9LSaGJwJlYevgxrstKXBD+AKNMBsvrvQ6icI2uXeOK2Xzxh/OM 9AVb+kT6Fci2zvv9SwPYVwKRFteEwDq/qfxqcuMBYX4E24Re4UEZGk/TyH8Qlm/aidJX U/zu4PVNUUY2OfI7EfUeUlB8JniAtYsrSwA1wLPox1eo3zuBA04n70jJjelqor1GH0C0 uFCAV++41a6hqe2Uxd42FKXFPH1Z9CzwI6M3mAEaymasVagaiB5BP79QNkxUrsw5wIW7 RShw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x80si7287240pfe.224.2019.03.04.21.51.04; Mon, 04 Mar 2019 21:51:19 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726590AbfCEFuX (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 5 Mar 2019 00:50:23 -0500 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:28241 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725782AbfCEFuW (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Mar 2019 00:50:22 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Mar 2019 21:50:21 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,442,1544515200"; d="scan'208";a="121039303" Received: from richard.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.159.54]) by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Mar 2019 21:50:20 -0800 Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 13:49:53 +0800 From: Wei Yang To: Like Xu Cc: Wei Yang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, dan.j.williams@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel, resource: use resource_overlaps() to simplify region_intersects() Message-ID: <20190305054953.GA16100@richard> Reply-To: Wei Yang References: <20190121012028.3913-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> <20190212001308.GA27906@richard> <8d01ff6c-94bb-8b94-5f51-5d229b3e24e5@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8d01ff6c-94bb-8b94-5f51-5d229b3e24e5@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 01:45:31PM +0800, Like Xu wrote: >On 2019/2/12 8:13, Wei Yang wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 09:20:28AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: >> > The three checks in region_intersects() is to see whether two resources >> > overlap. This means it could be simplified with one resource_overlaps(). >> > >> > Also fix two typo in related function. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Wei Yang >> >> Hello~ >> >> Would someone like to take a look? > >No semantic change and it looks good to me. > >Reviewed-by: Like Xu > >You may use scripts/get_maintainer.pl to cc more maintainers. > Yep, thanks for your suggestion :-) >> >> > --- >> > kernel/iomem.c | 4 ++-- >> > kernel/resource.c | 11 +++++------ >> > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/kernel/iomem.c b/kernel/iomem.c >> > index f7525e14ebc6..93c264444510 100644 >> > --- a/kernel/iomem.c >> > +++ b/kernel/iomem.c >> > @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ static void *try_ram_remap(resource_size_t offset, size_t size, >> > * >> > * MEMREMAP_WB - matches the default mapping for System RAM on >> > * the architecture. This is usually a read-allocate write-back cache. >> > - * Morever, if MEMREMAP_WB is specified and the requested remap region is RAM >> > + * Moreover, if MEMREMAP_WB is specified and the requested remap region is RAM >> > * memremap() will bypass establishing a new mapping and instead return >> > * a pointer into the direct map. >> > * >> > @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ void *memremap(resource_size_t offset, size_t size, unsigned long flags) >> > /* Try all mapping types requested until one returns non-NULL */ >> > if (flags & MEMREMAP_WB) { >> > /* >> > - * MEMREMAP_WB is special in that it can be satisifed >> > + * MEMREMAP_WB is special in that it can be satisfied >> > * from the direct map. Some archs depend on the >> > * capability of memremap() to autodetect cases where >> > * the requested range is potentially in System RAM. >> > diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c >> > index b0fbf685c77a..34dfb94305bb 100644 >> > --- a/kernel/resource.c >> > +++ b/kernel/resource.c >> > @@ -521,21 +521,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(page_is_ram); >> > int region_intersects(resource_size_t start, size_t size, unsigned long flags, >> > unsigned long desc) >> > { >> > - resource_size_t end = start + size - 1; >> > + struct resource res; >> > int type = 0; int other = 0; >> > struct resource *p; >> > >> > + res.start = start; >> > + res.end = start + size - 1; >> > + >> > read_lock(&resource_lock); >> > for (p = iomem_resource.child; p ; p = p->sibling) { >> > bool is_type = (((p->flags & flags) == flags) && >> > ((desc == IORES_DESC_NONE) || >> > (desc == p->desc))); >> > >> > - if (start >= p->start && start <= p->end) >> > - is_type ? type++ : other++; >> > - if (end >= p->start && end <= p->end) >> > - is_type ? type++ : other++; >> > - if (p->start >= start && p->end <= end) >> > + if (resource_overlaps(p, &res)) >> > is_type ? type++ : other++; >> > } >> > read_unlock(&resource_lock); >> > -- >> > 2.19.1 >> -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me