From: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz@hotmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Linux Kernel Microcode Question
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:40:49 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <Law10-F95ihL5C2Skqk00028182@hotmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1451
Lines: 36

The URL: http://www.urbanmyth.org/microcode/

The microcode_ctl utility is a companion to the IA32 microcode driver 
written by Tigran Aivazian <tigran@veritas.com>. The utility has two uses:

    * it decodes and sends new microcode to the kernel driver to be uploaded 
to Intel IA32 processors. (Pentium Pro, PII, PIII, Pentium 4, Celeron, Xeon 
etc - all P6 and above, which does NOT include pentium classics)
    * it signals the kernel driver to release any buffers it may hold

The microcode update is volatile and needs to be uploaded on each system 
boot i.e. it doesn't reflash your cpu permanently, reboot and it reverts 
back to the old microcode.

My question is, what are the advantages vs disadvantages in updating your 
CPU's microcode?

Is it worth it?

Does it matter what type of Intel CPU you have?

Do some CPU's benefit more than others for microcode updates?

I know RedHat distributions usually do this by default, but others do not.

Can anyone explain reasons to or not to update the CPU microcode?

_________________________________________________________________
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar ? get it now! 
http://clk.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/