Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262810AbUCRRyE (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:54:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262816AbUCRRyE (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:54:04 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:11165 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262810AbUCRRx5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Mar 2004 12:53:57 -0500 Subject: Re: 2.6.4-mm2 From: Daniel McNeil To: Andrew Morton Cc: Chris Mason , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-aio@kvack.org" In-Reply-To: <1079572511.6930.5.camel@ibm-c.pdx.osdl.net> References: <20040314172809.31bd72f7.akpm@osdl.org> <1079461971.23783.5.camel@ibm-c.pdx.osdl.net> <1079474312.4186.927.camel@watt.suse.com> <20040316152106.22053934.akpm@osdl.org> <20040316152843.667a623d.akpm@osdl.org> <20040316153900.1e845ba2.akpm@osdl.org> <1079485055.4181.1115.camel@watt.suse.com> <1079487710.3100.22.camel@ibm-c.pdx.osdl.net> <20040316180043.441e8150.akpm@osdl.org> <1079554288.4183.1938.camel@watt.suse.com> <20040317123324.46411197.akpm@osdl.org> <1079563568.4185.1947.camel@watt.suse.com> <20040317150909.7fd121bd.akpm@osdl.org> <1079566076.4186.1959.camel@watt.suse.com> <20040317155111.49d09a87.akpm@osdl.org> <1079568387.4186.1964.camel@watt.suse.com> <20040317161338.28b21c35.akpm@osdl.org> <1079569870.4186.1967.camel@watt.suse.com> <20040317163332.0385d665.akpm@osdl.org> <1079572511.6930.5.camel@ibm-c.pdx.osdl.net> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1079632431.6930.30.camel@ibm-c.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-5) Date: 18 Mar 2004 09:53:51 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1558 Lines: 45 I'm ran 2.6.4-mm2 plus the 2 wait_on_page_range() patches, the test_set_page_writeback() patch and clear_page_dirty_for_io patch overnight. 6 copies of direct_read_under test on 8-cpu system on 1 ext3 file system in 1 directory on a scsi disk. (http://developer.osdl.org/daniel/AIO/TESTS/direct_read_under.c) 5 of the 6 tests saw uninitialized data within 2 hours. The sixth test ran overnight. Daniel On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 17:15, Daniel McNeil wrote: > I'm running without clear_page_dirty_for_io.patch on an 8-proc > with 6 direct_read_under tests on ext3. > > 2 failed in less than 5 minutes. The 4 others are still running > and it's been over 30 minutes. > > I'll run overnight wth clear_page_dirty_for_io.patch added in. > > Daniel > On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 16:33, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Chris Mason wrote: > > > > > > good news is that direct_read_under is still running without > > > problems here. > > > > Here also, but _without_ clear_page_dirty_for_io.patch, so it should break. > > > > Maybe it takes a long time. > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/