Received: by 2002:ac0:aed5:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id t21csp3938658imb; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 01:02:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzpIU0zQnhnE6nL2jm2Hj7TyebPt+ro7E/7HFVDx2KWS/39CjK3Tgkfpf/YDbLYwUaT0gTY X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:f209:: with SMTP id gn9mr5953825plb.50.1551862938819; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 01:02:18 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1551862938; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bl9yatSXZ+2nrozajcEhDyYsXuRsscJtpYodHS849kc02d1zYB9TCWQYTmsa3MgCZX cnXpUm20bs7h7uwWHkgV2nqD3FN1mBPen0+dPBlJs7dsLyk2FVIGn+7tAoQ3ybQVLlBU OWLPoKdFSjz2ctJXdEUFef7UHo+f/OoBt/Vtd1JvqpM3t9Pre7LwzRfGISwwM3q3c5+D UzxixaQUfkJ14TgWH8jItYIKZ3JOzN4+Nc2RM1lk12LmfjcesjSdVJLbfMgtMuILDarZ bmm9lfcIGfK/D+wvKROCJFIdB3jpMV/DNdmw7iVnNs7cTtHWyUs9CH9fZy2CagTPoNme cNqA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=zfs0fH1ZF1JcvLZ65vGUEAo6nzQMnrf7DhgZMObwKF4=; b=NnYwpGMzL4BBxrAhTVuyBRgzIqYuG/YOiw6xAYRBsjimute6fa7H14U+7i1hGvroJW JZgfxSNaV4o8qA/M2/P0jFV4tIFJfrX45ktP92CHJpueok01sIEEpupLeuOTuSYltDW+ SiquaBZIgaFV4YC/PPPK4jPKSqQtjrHYRdl3CIm3LbKHnjFO75xpF3ogffXi0HuMdlQJ FSneUKwJzLQ7IVUA0s3lziuk4mc6HAE4BoI93HR/+1aNLfR/28d0XHYebTap6GHIhBFm AMQ7pXRN0FnygHKga98o4yUbbjTPHSmELOQF0N2zcybvpXZlw9EWXOezoeyR68dUWY+I ruxg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=gFqzysaz; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x18si987191pgx.302.2019.03.06.01.02.03; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 01:02:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=gFqzysaz; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729209AbfCFJBU (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 6 Mar 2019 04:01:20 -0500 Received: from mail-vs1-f68.google.com ([209.85.217.68]:45016 "EHLO mail-vs1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728359AbfCFJBT (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Mar 2019 04:01:19 -0500 Received: by mail-vs1-f68.google.com with SMTP id r201so1754118vsc.11 for ; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 01:01:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zfs0fH1ZF1JcvLZ65vGUEAo6nzQMnrf7DhgZMObwKF4=; b=gFqzysazUh5Xjeow5jpekciXXnyiKa2zM6llC0i3GN/8Zd4oCnPJywNKwx5D+fls80 WFHor4XWsvM/Yw6bJggLWDwS05sVjnV0Z/HzNACeIxhDMkI/pBXtIfwgNTrfK5qEfkw1 M1rfi6Mg81TCzB9u6AHPzuofvitJrI6wPB6KHatQlYeUL8DasVgROgwvFHZPLXHu8CZD f95/29ES3huqosesyMRQU79jSsjo+/GOtlbCWVmQpW//9lSETsBFqzOmXzOg4G573qsf R+1Cc422Fxh1dMsXxvDJBmMcgbUvlnHq+WmXOvuPuEyc0cPWmKDyj9xoyOPVst8wUtF5 nZBw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zfs0fH1ZF1JcvLZ65vGUEAo6nzQMnrf7DhgZMObwKF4=; b=NjVx501yGxk7yAeSRXdTYwOw5S7b7R2X93/qWLuYNXn4Ce+06+8jm6fhsF5G2sf9o3 fS4MsopplGeDngMMq7jn/G++xKEpgjEbBUaA9tPKfKxglwGT1JkP34Y2wCaGxab9eEby Q7GWCf1lqu67NwPfCtpcax4WkUBc8lnOuWkT/pgLZsoINLX+Hvt6PzqElLOmvxS35yJt qoCTCJI9bebboc7aXqLCG+t8ehyxcZhTx/wbrYJlPzn03cuIGTC0u1JhZx3Fy+FNSoK6 0Z9inG+TFicADQgKy+ho+tbx0Q9FzE5wjms85wGav/CsUGKzS6+jenvekuM30nASYjH8 6RwQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUXHkCQT8Hz6Zk9E8x8i7LxSjzLMV7AJ98uHJulfhpNB10F6Aqh /76EhHJeST7hL1cvr5qMJ51SHXLp0c60R2YyfdR8VA== X-Received: by 2002:a67:8055:: with SMTP id b82mr3384656vsd.200.1551862878371; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 01:01:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1551802205-32188-1-git-send-email-ludovic.Barre@st.com> <1551802205-32188-2-git-send-email-ludovic.Barre@st.com> In-Reply-To: <1551802205-32188-2-git-send-email-ludovic.Barre@st.com> From: Ulf Hansson Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 10:00:42 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mmc: mmci: avoid fake busy polling To: Ludovic Barre Cc: Rob Herring , Srinivas Kandagatla , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Linux ARM , Linux Kernel Mailing List , DTML , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 at 17:10, Ludovic Barre wrote: > > From: Ludovic Barre > > The busy status bit could occurred even if no busy response is > expected (example cmd11). On sdmmc variant, the busy_detect_flag > reflects inverted value of d0 state, it's sampled at the end of a > CMD response and a second time 2 clk cycles after the CMD response. > To avoid a fake busy, the busy status could be checked and polled > only if the command has RSP_BUSY flag. > > Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre Before I review this, can you tell what HW you have tested this on? Kind regards Uffe > --- > drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c | 19 +++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c > index 387ff14..4901b73 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mmci.c > @@ -1220,12 +1220,13 @@ mmci_cmd_irq(struct mmci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd, > unsigned int status) > { > void __iomem *base = host->base; > - bool sbc; > + bool sbc, busy_resp; > > if (!cmd) > return; > > sbc = (cmd == host->mrq->sbc); > + busy_resp = !!(cmd->flags & MMC_RSP_BUSY); > > /* > * We need to be one of these interrupts to be considered worth > @@ -1239,8 +1240,7 @@ mmci_cmd_irq(struct mmci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd, > /* > * ST Micro variant: handle busy detection. > */ > - if (host->variant->busy_detect) { > - bool busy_resp = !!(cmd->flags & MMC_RSP_BUSY); > + if (busy_resp && host->variant->busy_detect) { > > /* We are busy with a command, return */ > if (host->busy_status && > @@ -1253,7 +1253,7 @@ mmci_cmd_irq(struct mmci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd, > * that the special busy status bit is still set before > * proceeding. > */ > - if (!host->busy_status && busy_resp && > + if (!host->busy_status && > !(status & (MCI_CMDCRCFAIL|MCI_CMDTIMEOUT)) && > (readl(base + MMCISTATUS) & host->variant->busy_detect_flag)) { > > @@ -1508,6 +1508,7 @@ static irqreturn_t mmci_irq(int irq, void *dev_id) > { > struct mmci_host *host = dev_id; > u32 status; > + bool busy_resp; > int ret = 0; > > spin_lock(&host->lock); > @@ -1550,9 +1551,15 @@ static irqreturn_t mmci_irq(int irq, void *dev_id) > } > > /* > - * Don't poll for busy completion in irq context. > + * Don't poll for: > + * -busy completion in irq context. > + * -no busy response expected. > */ > - if (host->variant->busy_detect && host->busy_status) > + busy_resp = host->cmd ? > + !!(host->cmd->flags & MMC_RSP_BUSY) : false; > + > + if (host->variant->busy_detect && > + (!busy_resp || host->busy_status)) > status &= ~host->variant->busy_detect_flag; > > ret = 1; > -- > 2.7.4 >