Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <info@metux.net>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     ericvh@gmail.com, lucho@ionkov.net, asmadeus@codewreck.org,
        v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PATCH] fs: 9p: Kconfig: pedantic cleanups
Date:   Wed,  6 Mar 2019 18:56:12 +0100
Message-Id: <1551894972-5807-1-git-send-email-info@metux.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult <info@metux.net>
---
 fs/9p/Kconfig | 20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/9p/Kconfig b/fs/9p/Kconfig
index 11045d8..e416057 100644
--- a/fs/9p/Kconfig
+++ b/fs/9p/Kconfig
@@ -31,13 +31,13 @@ endif
 
 
 config 9P_FS_SECURITY
-        bool "9P Security Labels"
-        depends on 9P_FS
-        help
-          Security labels support alternative access control models
-          implemented by security modules like SELinux.  This option
-          enables an extended attribute handler for file security
-          labels in the 9P filesystem.
-
-          If you are not using a security module that requires using
-          extended attributes for file security labels, say N.
+	bool "9P Security Labels"
+	depends on 9P_FS
+	help
+	  Security labels support alternative access control models
+	  implemented by security modules like SELinux.  This option
+	  enables an extended attribute handler for file security
+	  labels in the 9P filesystem.
+
+	  If you are not using a security module that requires using
+	  extended attributes for file security labels, say N.
-- 
1.9.1