Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: Hugetlbpages in very large memory
	machines.......
From: Stephen Smalley <sds@epoch.ncsc.mil>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>, anton@samba.org, ak@suse.de,
       raybry@sgi.com, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net,
       linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       mbligh@aracnet.com
In-Reply-To: <20040318122524.3904db7d.akpm@osdl.org>
References: <40528383.10305@sgi.com> <20040313034840.GF4638@wotan.suse.de>
	 <20040313184547.6e127b51.akpm@osdl.org>
	 <20040314040634.GC19737@krispykreme>
	 <37640233.1079550324@42.150.104.212.access.eclipse.net.uk>
	 <20040318122524.3904db7d.akpm@osdl.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: National Security Agency
Message-Id: <1079644967.12704.216.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:22:47 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 972
Lines: 24

On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 15:25, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Seems reasonable, although "vm_enough_acctdom" makes my eyes pop.  Why not
> keep the "vm_enough_memory" identifier?
> 
> I've asked Stephen for comment - assuming he's OK with it I'd ask you to
> finish this off please.

To keep the name, he needs to update all callers, right?  Current patch
appears to add a static inline for security_vm_enough_memory that
retains the old interface to avoid having to update most callers.

I don't have any fundamental problem with the nature of the change.  As
a side note, patch was malformed (at least as I received it), not sure
if that was just a problem on my end.

-- 
Stephen Smalley <sds@epoch.ncsc.mil>
National Security Agency

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/