Received: by 2002:ac0:aed5:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id t21csp4633170imb; Wed, 6 Mar 2019 19:10:06 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxt81GOdZdIsMHJM5N/TFfNzRPcBkOxIOf5SMoD8X3Cd+IUUSFxribhpmQWcmUaZQfZ24v4 X-Received: by 2002:a63:da43:: with SMTP id l3mr9496089pgj.164.1551928206188; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 19:10:06 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1551928206; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=YkZdmYxr3F3PEKUB8T3RAsAKvuJhYIjCTHI9OWIpvGx3KtSOtkm8buG0tVI/E/REkh tPR/jH8zwPr0o5uxAwHoC1rKuyXeEOcTLGJWpXCID5hWR7/HmoWL7lp/vnMu/ge4sHDn 5rsWbh5UbT8CplH+AkY0BNzxlXcg20eYImTSplEv4mqlQi5uQ0X7ZNvzKs6b6V1ennZR ZoC2d79L+2agkjQ3JLFCibvV5S3wRgjrYfNbEzKOCHr141gLWx/IUwipxPYSjkIEIYBG vQDWW1y1MG/VJL6dDR38in/yyyKf7Gcbgg/aDnojWwbsNu5YFGYNCkDWo4O2MizcGLuT z42w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id; bh=tOTwHw0pGgDLePGag33bPafZhpzjDqmSzubQ+3q2KnQ=; b=PY4BgFWLx5Tx1kVNSdul1eQVgfSC8PCsfCb0QicFMqw9JaTRUxfOUaJWAoEtXsIvi7 L9xT1keGOpXBkPT8N9LxW7MTtKFiFHAfHzBi9FJ0eYkq0V0lYfisOxP+NlPe81FgcTy1 53PZh1z6qb+R6pVq2W14Lw33o6MeKBrxM8phaUrJxFLUtsMOKlvdFa4w9L+Japb+UFkV 3wXWqHVjihI2XnR5UHgsYwPCAzntUWhkvkrjdmrZzFPytyfKijVDMok1xVi4GWGgPqGf DC0/fojeSgmVEvHoxSWlOLuEjlBjK175T2QQPMdLOOXrOAn8X05OYEZYCWvbOmfY0Ntv KgtA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f22si2747966pgv.578.2019.03.06.19.09.49; Wed, 06 Mar 2019 19:10:06 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727544AbfCGDJ1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 6 Mar 2019 22:09:27 -0500 Received: from mailgw02.mediatek.com ([1.203.163.81]:55392 "EHLO mailgw02.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726873AbfCGDJ0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Mar 2019 22:09:26 -0500 X-UUID: ec56263983e340628cf7d48f5a8c1155-20190307 X-UUID: ec56263983e340628cf7d48f5a8c1155-20190307 Received: from mtkcas36.mediatek.inc [(172.27.4.253)] by mailgw02.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (mailgw01.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLS) with ESMTP id 1602340617; Thu, 07 Mar 2019 11:09:16 +0800 Received: from MTKCAS36.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.186) by MTKMBS31N1.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.69) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 11:09:15 +0800 Received: from [10.17.3.153] (172.27.4.253) by MTKCAS36.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.170) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 11:09:14 +0800 Message-ID: <1551928154.30363.48.camel@mhfsdcap03> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] i2c: mediatek: Add i2c support for MediaTek MT8183 From: Qii Wang To: Matthias Brugger CC: , , , , , , , , , , Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 11:09:14 +0800 In-Reply-To: <40bf7264-1fc7-320a-1122-1782b57c5b53@gmail.com> References: <1550666030-30211-1-git-send-email-qii.wang@mediatek.com> <1550666030-30211-4-git-send-email-qii.wang@mediatek.com> <40bf7264-1fc7-320a-1122-1782b57c5b53@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I am sorry to have missed some comment, and reply the mail again. On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 15:41 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > On 20/02/2019 13:33, Qii Wang wrote: > > Add i2c compatible for MT8183. Compare to MT2712 i2c controller, > > MT8183 has different registers, offsets and clock. > > > > Signed-off-by: Qii Wang > > So you introduce arb clock, ltiming (what is this exactly) and the new SoC in > one commit. I'd prefer to split that up and explain shortly in the commit > message why they are needed. More comments inline. > I have split this patch into three in V5. > > --- > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > > 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c > > index 428ac99..82eedbd 100644 > > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c > > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c > > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ > > #include > > > > #define I2C_RS_TRANSFER (1 << 4) > > +#define I2C_ARB_LOST (1 << 3) > > #define I2C_HS_NACKERR (1 << 2) > > #define I2C_ACKERR (1 << 1) > > #define I2C_TRANSAC_COMP (1 << 0) > > @@ -76,6 +77,8 @@ > > #define I2C_CONTROL_DIR_CHANGE (0x1 << 4) > > #define I2C_CONTROL_ACKERR_DET_EN (0x1 << 5) > > #define I2C_CONTROL_TRANSFER_LEN_CHANGE (0x1 << 6) > > +#define I2C_CONTROL_DMAACK_EN (0x1 << 8) > > +#define I2C_CONTROL_ASYNC_MODE (0x1 << 9) > > #define I2C_CONTROL_WRAPPER (0x1 << 0) > > > > #define I2C_DRV_NAME "i2c-mt65xx" > > @@ -130,6 +133,8 @@ enum I2C_REGS_OFFSET { > > OFFSET_DEBUGCTRL, > > OFFSET_TRANSFER_LEN_AUX, > > OFFSET_CLOCK_DIV, > > + /* MT8183 only regs */ > > + OFFSET_LTIMING, > > }; > > > > static const u16 mt_i2c_regs_v1[] = { > > @@ -159,6 +164,32 @@ enum I2C_REGS_OFFSET { > > [OFFSET_CLOCK_DIV] = 0x70, > > }; > > > > +static const u16 mt_i2c_regs_v2[] = { > > + [OFFSET_DATA_PORT] = 0x0, > > + [OFFSET_SLAVE_ADDR] = 0x4, > > + [OFFSET_INTR_MASK] = 0x8, > > + [OFFSET_INTR_STAT] = 0xc, > > + [OFFSET_CONTROL] = 0x10, > > + [OFFSET_TRANSFER_LEN] = 0x14, > > + [OFFSET_TRANSAC_LEN] = 0x18, > > + [OFFSET_DELAY_LEN] = 0x1c, > > + [OFFSET_TIMING] = 0x20, > > + [OFFSET_START] = 0x24, > > + [OFFSET_EXT_CONF] = 0x28, > > + [OFFSET_LTIMING] = 0x2c, > > + [OFFSET_HS] = 0x30, > > + [OFFSET_IO_CONFIG] = 0x34, > > + [OFFSET_FIFO_ADDR_CLR] = 0x38, > > + [OFFSET_TRANSFER_LEN_AUX] = 0x44, > > + [OFFSET_CLOCK_DIV] = 0x48, > > + [OFFSET_SOFTRESET] = 0x50, > > + [OFFSET_DEBUGSTAT] = 0xe0, > > + [OFFSET_DEBUGCTRL] = 0xe8, > > + [OFFSET_FIFO_STAT] = 0xf4, > > + [OFFSET_FIFO_THRESH] = 0xf8, > > + [OFFSET_DCM_EN] = 0xf88, > > +}; > > + > > struct mtk_i2c_compatible { > > const struct i2c_adapter_quirks *quirks; > > const u16 *regs; > > @@ -168,6 +199,7 @@ struct mtk_i2c_compatible { > > unsigned char aux_len_reg: 1; > > unsigned char support_33bits: 1; > > unsigned char timing_adjust: 1; > > + unsigned char dma_sync: 1; > > }; > > > > struct mtk_i2c { > > @@ -181,6 +213,7 @@ struct mtk_i2c { > > struct clk *clk_main; /* main clock for i2c bus */ > > struct clk *clk_dma; /* DMA clock for i2c via DMA */ > > struct clk *clk_pmic; /* PMIC clock for i2c from PMIC */ > > + struct clk *clk_arb; /* Arbitrator clock for i2c */ > > bool have_pmic; /* can use i2c pins from PMIC */ > > bool use_push_pull; /* IO config push-pull mode */ > > > > @@ -190,6 +223,7 @@ struct mtk_i2c { > > enum mtk_trans_op op; > > u16 timing_reg; > > u16 high_speed_reg; > > + u16 ltiming_reg; > > unsigned char auto_restart; > > bool ignore_restart_irq; > > const struct mtk_i2c_compatible *dev_comp; > > @@ -216,6 +250,7 @@ struct mtk_i2c { > > .aux_len_reg = 1, > > .support_33bits = 1, > > .timing_adjust = 1, > > + .dma_sync = 0, > > }; > > > > static const struct mtk_i2c_compatible mt6577_compat = { > > @@ -227,6 +262,7 @@ struct mtk_i2c { > > .aux_len_reg = 0, > > .support_33bits = 0, > > .timing_adjust = 0, > > + .dma_sync = 0, > > }; > > > > static const struct mtk_i2c_compatible mt6589_compat = { > > @@ -238,6 +274,7 @@ struct mtk_i2c { > > .aux_len_reg = 0, > > .support_33bits = 0, > > .timing_adjust = 0, > > + .dma_sync = 0, > > }; > > > > static const struct mtk_i2c_compatible mt7622_compat = { > > @@ -249,6 +286,7 @@ struct mtk_i2c { > > .aux_len_reg = 1, > > .support_33bits = 0, > > .timing_adjust = 0, > > + .dma_sync = 0, > > }; > > > > static const struct mtk_i2c_compatible mt8173_compat = { > > @@ -259,6 +297,18 @@ struct mtk_i2c { > > .aux_len_reg = 1, > > .support_33bits = 1, > > .timing_adjust = 0, > > + .dma_sync = 0, > > +}; > > + > > +static const struct mtk_i2c_compatible mt8183_compat = { > > + .regs = mt_i2c_regs_v2, > > + .pmic_i2c = 0, > > + .dcm = 0, > > + .auto_restart = 1, > > + .aux_len_reg = 1, > > + .support_33bits = 1, > > + .timing_adjust = 1, > > + .dma_sync = 1, > > }; > > > > static const struct of_device_id mtk_i2c_of_match[] = { > > @@ -267,6 +317,7 @@ struct mtk_i2c { > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6589-i2c", .data = &mt6589_compat }, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt7622-i2c", .data = &mt7622_compat }, > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-i2c", .data = &mt8173_compat }, > > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-i2c", .data = &mt8183_compat }, > > {} > > }; > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_i2c_of_match); > > @@ -299,8 +350,18 @@ static int mtk_i2c_clock_enable(struct mtk_i2c *i2c) > > if (ret) > > goto err_pmic; > > } > > + > > + if (i2c->clk_arb) { > > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(i2c->clk_arb); > > + if (ret) > > + goto err_arb; > > + } > > + > > return 0; > > > > +err_arb: > > + if (i2c->have_pmic) > > + clk_disable_unprepare(i2c->clk_pmic); > > err_pmic: > > clk_disable_unprepare(i2c->clk_main); > > err_main: > > @@ -311,6 +372,9 @@ static int mtk_i2c_clock_enable(struct mtk_i2c *i2c) > > > > static void mtk_i2c_clock_disable(struct mtk_i2c *i2c) > > { > > + if (i2c->clk_arb) > > + clk_disable_unprepare(i2c->clk_arb); > > + > > if (i2c->have_pmic) > > clk_disable_unprepare(i2c->clk_pmic); > > > > @@ -338,6 +402,8 @@ static void mtk_i2c_init_hw(struct mtk_i2c *i2c) > > > > mtk_i2c_writew(i2c, i2c->timing_reg, OFFSET_TIMING); > > mtk_i2c_writew(i2c, i2c->high_speed_reg, OFFSET_HS); > > + if (i2c->dev_comp->regs == mt_i2c_regs_v2) > > I'm not really happy with this check. I personally would prefer a flag or > something which shows that we need ltiming. > ok, I will add a flag(ltiming_adjust) in mtk_i2c_compatible. > > + mtk_i2c_writew(i2c, i2c->ltiming_reg, OFFSET_LTIMING); > > > > /* If use i2c pin from PMIC mt6397 side, need set PATH_DIR first */ > > if (i2c->have_pmic) > > @@ -345,6 +411,9 @@ static void mtk_i2c_init_hw(struct mtk_i2c *i2c) > > > > control_reg = I2C_CONTROL_ACKERR_DET_EN | > > I2C_CONTROL_CLK_EXT_EN | I2C_CONTROL_DMA_EN; > > + if (i2c->dev_comp->dma_sync) > > + control_reg |= I2C_CONTROL_DMAACK_EN | I2C_CONTROL_ASYNC_MODE; > > + > > mtk_i2c_writew(i2c, control_reg, OFFSET_CONTROL); > > mtk_i2c_writew(i2c, I2C_DELAY_LEN, OFFSET_DELAY_LEN); > > > > @@ -434,6 +503,8 @@ static int mtk_i2c_set_speed(struct mtk_i2c *i2c, unsigned int parent_clk) > > unsigned int clk_src; > > unsigned int step_cnt; > > unsigned int sample_cnt; > > + unsigned int l_step_cnt; > > + unsigned int l_sample_cnt; > > unsigned int target_speed; > > int ret; > > > > @@ -443,11 +514,11 @@ static int mtk_i2c_set_speed(struct mtk_i2c *i2c, unsigned int parent_clk) > > if (target_speed > MAX_FS_MODE_SPEED) { > > /* Set master code speed register */ > > ret = mtk_i2c_calculate_speed(i2c, clk_src, MAX_FS_MODE_SPEED, > > - &step_cnt, &sample_cnt); > > + &l_step_cnt, &l_sample_cnt); > > if (ret < 0) > > return ret; > > > > - i2c->timing_reg = (sample_cnt << 8) | step_cnt; > > + i2c->timing_reg = (l_sample_cnt << 8) | l_step_cnt; > > > > /* Set the high speed mode register */ > > ret = mtk_i2c_calculate_speed(i2c, clk_src, target_speed, > > @@ -457,6 +528,8 @@ static int mtk_i2c_set_speed(struct mtk_i2c *i2c, unsigned int parent_clk) > > > > i2c->high_speed_reg = I2C_TIME_DEFAULT_VALUE | > > (sample_cnt << 12) | (step_cnt << 8); > > + i2c->ltiming_reg = (l_sample_cnt << 6) | l_step_cnt | > > + (sample_cnt << 12) | (step_cnt << 9); > > IMHO setting these for all SoCs but then only using it for one makes things more > complicated. Value should only be set for SoCs that need this features. > ok, I will set it dependent on ltiming_adjust. > > } else { > > ret = mtk_i2c_calculate_speed(i2c, clk_src, target_speed, > > &step_cnt, &sample_cnt); > > @@ -467,6 +540,8 @@ static int mtk_i2c_set_speed(struct mtk_i2c *i2c, unsigned int parent_clk) > > > > /* Disable the high speed transaction */ > > i2c->high_speed_reg = I2C_TIME_CLR_VALUE; > > + > > + i2c->ltiming_reg = (sample_cnt << 6) | step_cnt; > > } > > > > return 0; > > @@ -519,13 +594,13 @@ static int mtk_i2c_do_transfer(struct mtk_i2c *i2c, struct i2c_msg *msgs, > > > > /* Clear interrupt status */ > > mtk_i2c_writew(i2c, restart_flag | I2C_HS_NACKERR | I2C_ACKERR | > > - I2C_TRANSAC_COMP, OFFSET_INTR_STAT); > > + I2C_ARB_LOST | I2C_TRANSAC_COMP, OFFSET_INTR_STAT); > > Did you test that this works with all the old SoCs that are already supported by > this driver? > > Regards, > Matthias > Yes, old SoCs also have the bit(I2C_ARB_LOST), but there was no need for multi-master before, so we didn't set it up specifically. > > > > mtk_i2c_writew(i2c, I2C_FIFO_ADDR_CLR, OFFSET_FIFO_ADDR_CLR); > > > > /* Enable interrupt */ > > mtk_i2c_writew(i2c, restart_flag | I2C_HS_NACKERR | I2C_ACKERR | > > - I2C_TRANSAC_COMP, OFFSET_INTR_MASK); > > + I2C_ARB_LOST | I2C_TRANSAC_COMP, OFFSET_INTR_MASK); > > > > /* Set transfer and transaction len */ > > if (i2c->op == I2C_MASTER_WRRD) { > > @@ -659,7 +734,7 @@ static int mtk_i2c_do_transfer(struct mtk_i2c *i2c, struct i2c_msg *msgs, > > > > /* Clear interrupt mask */ > > mtk_i2c_writew(i2c, ~(restart_flag | I2C_HS_NACKERR | I2C_ACKERR | > > - I2C_TRANSAC_COMP), OFFSET_INTR_MASK); > > + I2C_ARB_LOST | I2C_TRANSAC_COMP), OFFSET_INTR_MASK); > > > > if (i2c->op == I2C_MASTER_WR) { > > dma_unmap_single(i2c->dev, wpaddr, > > @@ -884,6 +959,10 @@ static int mtk_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > return PTR_ERR(i2c->clk_dma); > > } > > > > + i2c->clk_arb = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "arb"); > > + if (IS_ERR(i2c->clk_arb)) > > + i2c->clk_arb = NULL; > > + > > clk = i2c->clk_main; > > if (i2c->have_pmic) { > > i2c->clk_pmic = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "pmic"); > >