Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263315AbUCSAWK (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:22:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263354AbUCRXxs (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Mar 2004 18:53:48 -0500 Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.102]:37840 "EHLO e2.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263332AbUCRXdO (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Mar 2004 18:33:14 -0500 Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:32:27 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Jesse Barnes , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, colpatch@us.ibm.com cc: akpm@osdl.org, wli@holomorphy.com, haveblue@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce nodemask_t ADT [0/7] Message-ID: <8090000.1079652747@flay> In-Reply-To: <200403181523.10670.jbarnes@sgi.com> References: <1079651064.8149.158.camel@arrakis> <200403181523.10670.jbarnes@sgi.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.2 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1671 Lines: 33 > On Thursday 18 March 2004 3:04 pm, Matthew Dobson wrote: >> do most anything you'd want to do with a nodemask. This stops us from >> open-coding nodemask operations, allows non-consecutive node numbering >> (ie: nodes don't have to be numbered 0...numnodes-1), gets rid of >> numnodes entirely (replaced with num_online_nodes()), and will >> facilitate the hotplugging of whole nodes. > > My hero! :) I think this has been needed for awhile, but now that I > think about it, it begs the question of what a node is. Is it a set > of CPUs and blocks of memory (that seems to be the most commonly used > definition in the code), just memory, just CPUs, or what? On sn2 > hardware, we have the concept of a node without CPUs. And due to our > wacky I/O layout, we also have nodes without CPUs *or* memory! (The > I/O guys call these "ionodes".) And then of course, there are CPUs > that aren't particularly close to any memory (i.e. they have none of > their own, and have to go several hops and/or through other CPUs to > get at memory at all). I think the closest answer we have is that it's a grouping of cpus and memory, where either may be NULL. I/O isn't directly associated with a node, though it should fit into the topo infrastructure, to give distances from io buses to nodes (for which I think we currently use cpumasks, which is probably wrong in retrospect, but then life is tough and flawed ;-)) M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/