Received: by 2002:ac0:aed5:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id t21csp5071573imb; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 07:09:46 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxRZKS5q8j+IZAtKM1fTlsTjanrCRNXk3Kpz1+EzLOv41HEKWAWFWywQiemDNDuuPi769IW X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:2a29:: with SMTP id i38mr13404184plb.110.1551971386570; Thu, 07 Mar 2019 07:09:46 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1551971386; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZDDBu08jRtlAXh/tAKH1lPVuIDxTip292MSiyiRs8CkuW9yTnXmzImxfiQzlySiVFs geQDlF6oVhG9RjE02b5gYlYZ1+uiyOmT6MA0RdOpuoOtkmKMJoG62vfYEv0UX+p59n9B 7b5drwNaah4LBBpoNO1orqIWeZu26SzY0WAML3P3/yFYEBpcMSH1tMTbAT/AZwD3xB64 Zmx9HIRW0BGnTeoryutp2ruHUaCVeMraPE7bTFs1CrYNab2xW8i8dM410pILM011eIe3 bMx7VGAbbGYJXrv3xgT8f+HdIW+A1e8Fv+MJD5uBDcSbqPBs5rjF/JgKXYNk815XyP79 Y+tQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=NdM9OunmDBD3vi69lNot7+MT6TRGTvMKvEqQkP8XtLE=; b=Fs3g1WwN5SaTec1abS1Z82JmhlI6eQ6uB8wg9SgcMd/4/87cpplpyVXBV6Hsyk760A a8rHPHB16EV31hjCtHbiWO8Q2xbc5fVL8uCo0OhSv9U23uJYh4ywzNj85j+3w7tLzZOc GMlAJP4SPtiJ+tVccbgIaRSB/H4fto+Ampg+2JjHb10Nu+SsPfmlLVQ9BbY1RHvB5ksT Sgvo8Nhiho7WVVeWuPkig+GusiHZUetpT01A1gHroufJ7vb/Ti29wCLw+JdXM/qotNeu 34kIuafK2p5NLgrHNayYKbCHmMWVbEu44zq+cwutFQGMG3GG81cLAbe5NlFa1u0R1pWx J8uQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 31si4520908plc.190.2019.03.07.07.09.30; Thu, 07 Mar 2019 07:09:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=alibaba.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726352AbfCGPHS (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 7 Mar 2019 10:07:18 -0500 Received: from out30-130.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.130]:59224 "EHLO out30-130.freemail.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726224AbfCGPHS (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Mar 2019 10:07:18 -0500 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R741e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01f04392;MF=shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=4;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0TMBVIKI_1551971208; Received: from ali-6c96cfdd1403.local(mailfrom:shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0TMBVIKI_1551971208) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Thu, 07 Mar 2019 23:06:57 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcache: add cond_resched() in __bch_cache_cmp() To: Coly Li Cc: Kent Overstreet , linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1551935728-243664-1-git-send-email-shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com> <24916a71-39ff-7324-ad12-9d79cc68d0da@suse.de> From: Shile Zhang Message-ID: <3640cd7f-f32a-1509-dbef-6000b6e14e75@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 23:06:47 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <24916a71-39ff-7324-ad12-9d79cc68d0da@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019/3/7 18:34, Coly Li wrote: > On 2019/3/7 1:15 下午, shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com wrote: >> From: Shile Zhang >> >> Read /sys/fs/bcache//cacheN/priority_stats can take very long >> time with huge cache after long run. >> >> Signed-off-by: Shile Zhang > Hi Shile, > > Do you test your change ? It will be helpful with more performance data > (what problem that you improved). In case of 960GB SSD cache device, once read of the 'priority_stats' costs about 600ms in our test environment. The perf tool shown that near 50% CPU time consumed by 'sort()', this means once sort will hold the CPU near 300ms. In our case, the statistics collector reads the 'priority_stats' periodically, it will trigger the schedule latency jitters of the task which shared same CPU core. > > Thanks. > > Coly Li > >> --- >> drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c b/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c >> index 557a8a3..028fea1 100644 >> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c >> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c >> @@ -897,6 +897,7 @@ static void bch_cache_set_internal_release(struct kobject *k) >> >> static int __bch_cache_cmp(const void *l, const void *r) >> { >> + cond_resched(); >> return *((uint16_t *)r) - *((uint16_t *)l); >> } >> >> >