Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262756AbUCSLjK (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Mar 2004 06:39:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262784AbUCSLjK (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Mar 2004 06:39:10 -0500 Received: from dwdmx2.dwd.de ([141.38.3.197]:38731 "HELO dwdmx2.dwd.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262756AbUCSLjH (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Mar 2004 06:39:07 -0500 Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:39:04 +0000 (GMT) From: Holger Kiehl X-X-Sender: kiehl@praktifix.dwd.de To: Jens Axboe cc: linux-kernel Subject: Re: 2.6.5-rc1-mm2 very slow In-Reply-To: <20040319101451.GM22234@suse.de> Message-Id: References: <20040319101451.GM22234@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 991 Lines: 30 On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19 2004, Holger Kiehl wrote: > > Hello > > > > I am testing 2.6.5-rc1-mm2 and find it very slow when I do a bonnie > > test, also the system itself feels very sluggish. Looking at dmesg > > I get the following: > > > > Badness in elv_remove_request at drivers/block/elevator.c:249 > > Call Trace: > > [] elv_remove_request+0x8d/0x8f > > [] scsi_request_fn+0x289/0x333 > > [] elv_next_request+0x3d/0xcb > > [] generic_unplug_device+0x43/0x45 > > Does it still complain with this patch? > No, this also fixes the slowness. Performance is back to normal. That was the quickest patch I have ever received :) Many thanks! Holger - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/