Received: by 2002:ac0:aed5:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id t21csp5837506imb; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 03:32:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw4pmvo3hTSr7UZLMyQ4wBhUNQKTboQUzuWexuu0zO0ZqVjM8M7ksTYScff7MHDKWMoQxGk X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:59c3:: with SMTP id d3mr18427138plj.214.1552044759565; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 03:32:39 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1552044759; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=hI+JnKPmhAl+Dq3UqProAgDcY+WfjAEd/y9o7T20dJJ0pi7oVuxJsdGeVdA+B2Wv8d 1DDzHhjaSH0nWra7Cyfi9wpzJ7E7XmR7mrHrTLCXW2W9AM6FfI8qMArRQOVxuE4QWkTP qUWw8ra0hf1xdR/38AWqJKDamk7TuqrfSoi13KcFLDoMWYobluJVe2maufYwLVWveFUw IcSfOUGKrKRFUbWsrYTipYiFjg6ItLVi5lTCLJsLZKuSxJ7jsAP/5u/A4MIVYqvXawZ3 uJ6rJPVNt+rvEnThn983FEmJ18h/yqZ7IB1PxFAtrF4RMk52cnF+aE2kt6jHtAZtsuYx wDcw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject :message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :dkim-signature; bh=t30YqL6jxYKwAJQwhZzIF4ea2sm4hbFhJmIjweczmHY=; b=C+DfZagCbl6Aqbuz6cwbTNT1pajNkG+X+gI1gBXdIaMSRPM5HVa5EQfPHKp4InNqQB Emrh8weIhEi+gFNnJoHKY49m61HYE4tWgtYnBhxibrDhdOtze0MNVVdP7qKldliORWdZ Ed5kSmIqNrzPjFgbpLRglYET3gXIMSBEhD+coEaUOjv5iCYo048+kUZk49Bq9lCPqBMZ JbFiRQxZZtsWD/HCDzmbMsfeDegluSKvtbosQUMij6EaUrXXSlBSK+FzRmkaktfrmpm0 88OWewrhsNjz1rS8aifCbuAi9tueiXEKXe5pNHFdYhH/7SJCwFl3kO3RcYwQti91U58D 5ieg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@sifive.com header.s=google header.b=VMBJ6gpT; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q11si6249454pgv.337.2019.03.08.03.32.23; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 03:32:39 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@sifive.com header.s=google header.b=VMBJ6gpT; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726387AbfCHLaS (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 8 Mar 2019 06:30:18 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-f196.google.com ([209.85.208.196]:43484 "EHLO mail-lj1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726297AbfCHLaR (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Mar 2019 06:30:17 -0500 Received: by mail-lj1-f196.google.com with SMTP id z20so17093066ljj.10 for ; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 03:30:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sifive.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=t30YqL6jxYKwAJQwhZzIF4ea2sm4hbFhJmIjweczmHY=; b=VMBJ6gpT/Xmd9OQLficn7Yis3Oy0YFrgPhKbCLjPkfu8BPphw5pgpeSv7/BdaU+4Dg XzW7Keypn9iJ8x2unVlc0RSno8BHsMqSw1HjeIMaM2ZA3x3Y391Z2tiYp8BpmqxXdQEt GtuqicsQL4sBYnzd/2laBdhoJ3sDVCT8V2xckmf5XEFQWbc0/1Qf0aBqvNvzeGy1zeY9 NPRDioJXAsxGymoCXyXWZKH6arvuX9Imz6vb/dZ0m7iqxlBbsn/bLOWUBg3QD6Jvn10z bAis56JAjU+p7MQoc1nforzzPI+vxLu9RVpq46BDBv98NEpdvPDIHW7M+gBqLkloNXvj JjXg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=t30YqL6jxYKwAJQwhZzIF4ea2sm4hbFhJmIjweczmHY=; b=ZhCXPPSI/81kE2zPpYBAHYFTsXVnX8qfsG0Uohp8aZZNPENA/2WIY9mT+6c0sCrHYN CfJDcw9rhAYgqx+GpLEu5pBKv7TZtDwuBBq7jLmhVVbLOSaYiHseWpc2LjcEf4Qwe5S5 d5x5LoEbyeUoCGMZTbUb2bFPdrbsa+5a/lOSHipqUOa5Ql2b/Vmyg8+1FRy7BjHlN+rV CQi7RA7JmeLl6Cu7W+WdSg+NNvzpT6CaRJ0a8Boff5blDvQmMbbnzNC83mHJX7wCdmQS 40g1ShYoCeS3KctelUavl9it8Y+7BVfkC/UsBWEGhwaJYXhcZWrsSXUyF2dqcz4HbBo5 RpLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU1VRj3tFNr6Ska1HMqRCyQbOwWu9nwpxpGLPbI0H3a+ntyHC0m Z2XExJ5wNd1KPaEVV5zo72ovOUehQ3ZDk7wqv+YaxA== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:ca:: with SMTP id e71mr8571104lji.137.1552044613733; Fri, 08 Mar 2019 03:30:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1551437599-29509-1-git-send-email-yash.shah@sifive.com> <1551437599-29509-3-git-send-email-yash.shah@sifive.com> <20190307152745.kaiv6q4ygf2apmuv@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20190307152745.kaiv6q4ygf2apmuv@pengutronix.de> From: Yash Shah Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 16:59:36 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] pwm: sifive: Add a driver for SiFive SoC PWM To: =?UTF-8?Q?Uwe_Kleine=2DK=C3=B6nig?= Cc: Palmer Dabbelt , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Thierry Reding , robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sachin Ghadi , Paul Walmsley , kernel@pengutronix.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 8:57 PM Uwe Kleine-K=C3=B6nig wrote: > > Hello, > > On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 04:23:19PM +0530, Yash Shah wrote: > > Adds a PWM driver for PWM chip present in SiFive's HiFive Unleashed SoC= . > > > > Signed-off-by: Wesley W. Terpstra > > [Atish: Various fixes and code cleanup] > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra > > Signed-off-by: Yash Shah > > --- > > drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 11 ++ > > drivers/pwm/Makefile | 1 + > > drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c | 345 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++= ++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 357 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig > > index a8f47df..4a61d1a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig > > @@ -380,6 +380,17 @@ config PWM_SAMSUNG > > To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module > > will be called pwm-samsung. > > > > +config PWM_SIFIVE > > + tristate "SiFive PWM support" > > + depends on OF > > + depends on COMMON_CLK > > + depends on RISCV || COMPILE_TEST > > + help > > + Generic PWM framework driver for SiFive SoCs. > > + > > + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module > > + will be called pwm-sifive. > > + > > config PWM_SPEAR > > tristate "STMicroelectronics SPEAr PWM support" > > depends on PLAT_SPEAR > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Makefile b/drivers/pwm/Makefile > > index 9c676a0..30089ca 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pwm/Makefile > > +++ b/drivers/pwm/Makefile > > @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_RCAR) +=3D pwm-rcar.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_RENESAS_TPU) +=3D pwm-renesas-tpu.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_ROCKCHIP) +=3D pwm-rockchip.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SAMSUNG) +=3D pwm-samsung.o > > +obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SIFIVE) +=3D pwm-sifive.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_SPEAR) +=3D pwm-spear.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_STI) +=3D pwm-sti.o > > obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_STM32) +=3D pwm-stm32.o > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..6679ec7 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sifive.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,345 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > +/* > > + * Copyright (C) 2017-2018 SiFive > > + * For SiFive's PWM IP block documentation please refer Chapter 14 of > > + * Reference Manual : https://static.dev.sifive.com/FU540-C000-v1.0.pd= f > > + * > > + * Limitations: > > + * - When changing both duty cycle and period, we cannot prevent in > > + * software that the output might produce a period with mixed > > + * settings (new period length and old duty cycle). > > + * - The hardware cannot generate a 100% duty cycle. > > + * - The hardware generates only inverted output. > > + */ > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > + > > +/* Register offsets */ > > +#define PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG 0x0 > > +#define PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCOUNT 0x8 > > +#define PWM_SIFIVE_PWMS 0x10 > > +#define PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCMP0 0x20 > > + > > +/* PWMCFG fields */ > > +#define PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG_SCALE 0 > > +#define PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG_STICKY 8 > > +#define PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG_ZERO_CMP 9 > > +#define PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG_DEGLITCH 10 > > +#define PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG_EN_ALWAYS BIT(12) > > +#define PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG_EN_ONCE 13 > > +#define PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG_CENTER 16 > > +#define PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG_GANG 24 > > +#define PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG_IP 28 > > It's a bit inconsistent to have one of them use BIT and the others not. > For consistency please use BIT for all defines. (They are unused > anyhow.) For PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG_SCALE use: > > #define PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG_SCALE GENMASK(3, 0) > > and then FIELD_GET and FIELD_PREP to access the values. Sure will do that. > > > +/* PWM_SIFIVE_SIZE_PWMCMP is used to calculate offset for pwmcmpX regi= sters */ > > +#define PWM_SIFIVE_SIZE_PWMCMP 4 > > +#define PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH 16 > > +#define PWM_SIFIVE_DEFAULT_PERIOD 10000000 > > + > > +struct pwm_sifive_ddata { > > + struct pwm_chip chip; > > + struct mutex lock; /* lock to protect user_count */ > > + struct notifier_block notifier; > > + struct clk *clk; > > + void __iomem *regs; > > + unsigned int real_period; > > + int user_count; > > +}; > > + > > +static inline > > +struct pwm_sifive_ddata *pwm_sifive_chip_to_ddata(struct pwm_chip *c) > > +{ > > + return container_of(c, struct pwm_sifive_ddata, chip); > > +} > > + > > +static int pwm_sifive_request(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device= *dev) > > +{ > > + struct pwm_sifive_ddata *pwm =3D pwm_sifive_chip_to_ddata(chip); > > + > > + mutex_lock(&pwm->lock); > > + pwm->user_count++; > > + mutex_unlock(&pwm->lock); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static void pwm_sifive_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *= dev) > > +{ > > + struct pwm_sifive_ddata *pwm =3D pwm_sifive_chip_to_ddata(chip); > > + > > + mutex_lock(&pwm->lock); > > + pwm->user_count--; > > + mutex_unlock(&pwm->lock); > > +} > > + > > +static void pwm_sifive_update_clock(struct pwm_sifive_ddata *pwm, > > + unsigned long rate) > > +{ > > + u32 val; > > + unsigned long long num; > > + /* (1 << (PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH+scale)) * 10^9/rate =3D real_period= */ > > + unsigned long scale_pow =3D > > + div64_ul(pwm->real_period * (u64)rate, NSEC_PER_S= EC); > > + int scale =3D clamp(ilog2(scale_pow) - PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH, 0, 0x= f); > > I tried for some time to verify the code here and this would have been > easier with a more verbose comment. Something like: > > /* > * The PWM unit is used with pwmzerocmp=3D0, so the only way to modify th= e > * period length is using pwmscale which provides the number of bits the > * counter is shifted before being feed to the comparators. A period > * lasts (1 << (PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH + pwmscale)) clock ticks. > */ Ok, will add this. > > There is a bad rounding effect here. I don't know the machine's details, > and so will consider a parent clock running at 250 MHz. So one clock tick > is 4 ns long and the smallest period length is 4 ns << 16 =3D=3D 262144 n= s. > Consider further an initial target period of 10000000 ns (which is > PWM_SIFIVE_DEFAULT_PERIOD). > > The calculation here results in scale_pow =3D 2500000 and so scale =3D 5. > > > + val =3D PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG_EN_ALWAYS | (scale << PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG= _SCALE); > > + writel(val, pwm->regs + PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG); > > + > > + /* As scale <=3D 15 the shift operation cannot overflow. */ > > + num =3D 1000000000ULL << (PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH + scale); > > + pwm->real_period =3D div64_ul(num, rate); > > + dev_dbg(pwm->chip.dev, "New real_period =3D %u ns\n", pwm->real_p= eriod); > > +} > > Then real_period ends up being 8388608 ns. If now the input clk increases > to 750 MHz it is 8388608 ns which is being used as target period length > and the calculation results in: > > scale_pow =3D 6291456 > scale =3D 6 > real_period =3D 5592405 > > I'd claim it would be better to use scale =3D 7 here which results in > 11184810 which is nearer to the initially targeted 10000000 ns. (But we > cannot be sure as there is no rounding guide for the PWM framework.) > > But worse than that is that if the input clock goes back to 250 MHz we > start with real_period =3D 5592405 and we get > > scale_pow =3D 1398101 > scale =3D 4 > real_period =3D 4194304 > > so we're not going back to the state we had when the clk was initially > running at 250 MHz. > > To get the result independent of the prior configuration you better use > the real targeted period length as input instead of the last configured > approximation. Sure. will change it. > > > +static void pwm_sifive_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_dev= ice *dev, > > + struct pwm_state *state) > > +{ > > + struct pwm_sifive_ddata *pwm =3D pwm_sifive_chip_to_ddata(chip); > > + u32 duty, val; > > + unsigned long long num; > > + int ret; > > + > > + ret =3D clk_enable(pwm->clk); > > + if (ret) > > + return; > > Ideally we'd report state->enabled =3D 0 if the clk was off. I don't know > how this could be done reliably though. > > > + duty =3D readl(pwm->regs + PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCMP0 + > > + dev->hwpwm * PWM_SIFIVE_SIZE_PWMCMP); > > + > > + state->enabled =3D duty > 0; > > If duty is bigger than 0 but PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG_EN_ALWAYS isn't set you > should report enabled =3D false, too. Will add this. > > > + val =3D readl(pwm->regs + PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCFG); > > + val &=3D 0x0F; > > Maybe name that "scale" instead of "val"? Yes, will change it. > > > + num =3D 1000000000ULL << (PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH + val); > > Is this (unsigned long long)NSEC_PER_SEC? (Ditto above in > pwm_sifive_update_clock().) Yes, will change this too. > > > + pwm->real_period =3D div64_ul(num, clk_get_rate(pwm->clk)); > > + > > + state->period =3D pwm->real_period; > > + state->duty_cycle =3D > > + (u64)duty * pwm->real_period >> PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH; > > + state->polarity =3D PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED; > > + > > + clk_disable(pwm->clk); > > +} > > + > > +static int pwm_sifive_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, bool enable) > > +{ > > + struct pwm_sifive_ddata *pwm =3D pwm_sifive_chip_to_ddata(chip); > > + int ret; > > + > > + if (enable) { > > + ret =3D clk_enable(pwm->clk); > > + if (ret) { > > + dev_err(pwm->chip.dev, "Enable clk failed:%d\n", = ret); > > + return ret; > > + } > > + } > > + > > + if (!enable) > > + clk_disable(pwm->clk); > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int pwm_sifive_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *= dev, > > + struct pwm_state *state) > > +{ > > + struct pwm_sifive_ddata *pwm =3D pwm_sifive_chip_to_ddata(chip); > > + unsigned int duty_cycle, x; > > + u32 frac; > > + struct pwm_state cur_state; > > + bool enabled; > > + int ret =3D 0; > > + unsigned long num; > > + > > + if (state->polarity !=3D PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + mutex_lock(&pwm->lock); > > + pwm_get_state(dev, &cur_state); > > + enabled =3D cur_state.enabled; > > + > > + if (state->period !=3D cur_state.period) { > > Did you test this with more than one consumer? For sure the following > should work: > > pwm1 =3D pwm_get(.. the first ..); > pwm_apply_state(pwm1, { .enabled =3D true, .period =3D 10000000, = .... }); > > pwm2 =3D pwm_get(.. the second ..); > pwm_apply_state(pwm2, { .enabled =3D true, .period =3D 10000000, = .... }); > > but for the second pwm_apply_state() run state->period is likely not > exactly 10000000. Yes, I have tested multiple consumers using sysfs interface. It is working. > > > + if (pwm->user_count !=3D 1) { > > + ret =3D -EINVAL; > > EBUSY? ok > > > + goto exit; > > + } > > + pwm->real_period =3D state->period; > > + pwm_sifive_update_clock(pwm, clk_get_rate(pwm->clk)); > > It's not ensured that pwm->clk is enabled here which is a pre-condition > to be allowed to call clk_get_rate(). Will fix this > > > + } > > + > > + duty_cycle =3D state->duty_cycle; > > + if (!state->enabled) > > + duty_cycle =3D 0; > > + > > + x =3D 1U << PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH; > > "x" is a bad name. > > > + num =3D (u64)duty_cycle * x + x / 2; > > + frac =3D div_u64(num, state->period); > > I don't understand the "+ x / 2" part. Should this better be > "+ state->period / 2"? Something like This eqn is as per your comments against v5 of this patch series. frac =3D (duty_cycle * (1 << PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH) + (1 << PWM_SIFIVE_CMPWIDTH) / 2) / period; > > #define div_u64_round(a, b) ({typeof(b) __b =3D b; div_u64(a + __b / 2, _= _b)}) > > would make this less error prone. > > > + /* The hardware cannot generate a 100% duty cycle */ > > + frac =3D min(frac, x - 1); > > + > > + writel(frac, pwm->regs + PWM_SIFIVE_PWMCMP0 + > > + dev->hwpwm * PWM_SIFIVE_SIZE_PWMCMP); > > + > > + if (!state->enabled && enabled) { > > + ret =3D pwm_sifive_enable(chip, false); > > + if (ret) > > + goto exit; > > + enabled =3D false; > > + } > > + > > + if (state->enabled && !enabled) { > > + ret =3D pwm_sifive_enable(chip, state->enabled); > > + if (ret) > > + goto exit; > > + } > > These two ifs can be combined to: > > if (state->enabled !=3D enabled) > ret =3D pwm_sifive_enable(chip, state->enabled); Ok, will do that > > > + > > +exit: > > + mutex_unlock(&pwm->lock); > > + return ret; > > +} > > + > > +static const struct pwm_ops pwm_sifive_ops =3D { > > + .request =3D pwm_sifive_request, > > + .free =3D pwm_sifive_free, > > + .get_state =3D pwm_sifive_get_state, > > + .apply =3D pwm_sifive_apply, > > + .owner =3D THIS_MODULE, > > +}; > > + > > +static int pwm_sifive_clock_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, > > + unsigned long event, void *data) > > +{ > > + struct clk_notifier_data *ndata =3D data; > > + struct pwm_sifive_ddata *pwm =3D > > + container_of(nb, struct pwm_sifive_ddata, notifier); > > + > > + if (event =3D=3D POST_RATE_CHANGE) > > + pwm_sifive_update_clock(pwm, ndata->new_rate); > > + > > + return NOTIFY_OK; > > +} > > + > > +static int pwm_sifive_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > +{ > > + struct device *dev =3D &pdev->dev; > > + struct pwm_sifive_ddata *pwm; > > + struct pwm_chip *chip; > > + struct resource *res; > > + int ret, ch; > > + bool is_enabled =3D false; > > + > > + pwm =3D devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pwm), GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!pwm) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + > > + mutex_init(&pwm->lock); > > + chip =3D &pwm->chip; > > + chip->dev =3D dev; > > + chip->ops =3D &pwm_sifive_ops; > > + chip->of_pwm_n_cells =3D 3; > > + chip->base =3D -1; > > + chip->npwm =3D 4; > > + > > + res =3D platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > > + pwm->regs =3D devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res); > > + if (IS_ERR(pwm->regs)) { > > + dev_err(dev, "Unable to map IO resources\n"); > > + return PTR_ERR(pwm->regs); > > + } > > + > > + pwm->clk =3D devm_clk_get(dev, NULL); > > + if (IS_ERR(pwm->clk)) { > > + if (PTR_ERR(pwm->clk) !=3D -EPROBE_DEFER) > > + dev_err(dev, "Unable to find controller clock\n")= ; > > + return PTR_ERR(pwm->clk); > > + } > > + > > + ret =3D clk_prepare_enable(pwm->clk); > > + if (ret) { > > + dev_err(dev, "failed to enable clock for pwm: %d\n", ret)= ; > > + return ret; > > + } > > + > > + /* Watch for changes to underlying clock frequency */ > > + pwm->notifier.notifier_call =3D pwm_sifive_clock_notifier; > > + ret =3D clk_notifier_register(pwm->clk, &pwm->notifier); > > + if (ret) { > > + dev_err(dev, "failed to register clock notifier: %d\n", r= et); > > + goto disable_clk; > > + } > > + > > + ret =3D pwmchip_add(chip); > > + if (ret < 0) { > > + dev_err(dev, "cannot register PWM: %d\n", ret); > > + goto unregister_clk; > > + } > > After pwmchip_add is called the first consumer might appear... > > > + /* Initialize PWM */ > > + pwm->real_period =3D PWM_SIFIVE_DEFAULT_PERIOD; > > + pwm_sifive_update_clock(pwm, clk_get_rate(pwm->clk)); > > + > > + for (ch =3D 0; ch < pwm->chip.npwm; ch++) { > > + if (pwm_is_enabled(&pwm->chip.pwms[ch])) { > > + is_enabled =3D true; > > + break; > > + } > > + } > > + if (!is_enabled) > > + clk_disable(pwm->clk); > > ... so this should better be called after these initialisations. > (This also means you must not use pwm_is_enabled(), but I'd consider that > an upside, because this function is for PWM consumers, not > implementors.) Ok, will change the sequence. > > > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pwm); > > + dev_dbg(dev, "SiFive PWM chip registered %d PWMs\n", chip->npwm); > > + > > + return 0; > > + > > +unregister_clk: > > + clk_notifier_unregister(pwm->clk, &pwm->notifier); > > +disable_clk: > > + clk_disable_unprepare(pwm->clk); > > + > > + return ret; > > +} > > Best regards > Uwe > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K=C3=B6nig = | > Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ = |