Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 8 Mar 2019 16:58:14 +0100
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Calvin Owens <calvinowens@fb.com>,
        John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] printk: Add consoles to a virtual "console" bus
Message-ID: <20190308155814.rzsjrzgwfcm4p5sk@pathway.suse.cz>
References: <cover.1551486732.git.calvinowens@fb.com>
 <087b13f7812b32cc7c3f9efea71c9bcf324dd031.1551486732.git.calvinowens@fb.com>
 <87ef7ioyzw.fsf@linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87ef7ioyzw.fsf@linutronix.de>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170421 (1.8.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri 2019-03-08 03:56:19, John Ogness wrote:
> On 2019-03-02, Calvin Owens <calvinowens@fb.com> wrote:
> > This patch embeds a device struct in the console struct, and registers
> > them on a "console" bus so we can expose attributes in sysfs.
> 
> I expect that "class" would be more appropriate than "bus". These
> devices really are grouped together based on their function and not the
> medium by which they are accessed.

Good point. "class" looks better to me as well.

Greg, any opinion, where to put the entries for struct console ?

Best Regards,
Petr