Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 8 Mar 2019 10:03:36 -0600
From:   Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Cc:     Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/6xx: fix setup and use of SPRN_PGDIR for hash32
Message-ID: <20190308160334.GZ3969@gate.crashing.org>
References: <7e45ca3f0283fb24c2642e5b91bd75c55f2ba96f.1552028583.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7e45ca3f0283fb24c2642e5b91bd75c55f2ba96f.1552028583.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 07:05:22AM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Not only the 603 but all 6xx need SPRN_PGDIR to be initialised at
> startup. This patch move it from __setup_cpu_603() to start_here()
> and __secondary_start(), close to the initialisation of SPRN_THREAD.

I thought you meant an SPR I did not know about.  But you just misspelled
SPRN_SPRG_PGDIR :-)


Segher