Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 8 Mar 2019 14:13:45 -0500
From:   Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To:     Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc:     Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterx@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2 5/5] vhost: access vq metadata through kernel
 virtual address
Message-ID: <20190308191345.GB26923@redhat.com>
References: <1551856692-3384-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>
 <1551856692-3384-6-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>
 <20190307103503-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
 <20190307124700-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
 <20190307191720.GF3835@redhat.com>
 <43408100-84d9-a359-3e78-dc65fb7b0ad1@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <43408100-84d9-a359-3e78-dc65fb7b0ad1@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 04:58:44PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> Can I simply can set_page_dirty() before vunmap() in the mmu notifier 
> callback, or is there any reason that it must be called within vumap()?

I also don't see any problem in doing it before vunmap. As far as the
mmu notifier and set_page_dirty is concerned vunmap is just
put_page. It's just slower and potentially unnecessary.