Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Sat, 9 Mar 2019 06:35:12 -0800
From:   tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <tipbot@zytor.com>
Message-ID: <tip-f1212844e9dc3a31d41f99713c5522acf92ff291@git.kernel.org>
Cc:     riel@surriel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de,
        quentin.perret@arm.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        hpa@zytor.com, vincent.wang@unisoc.com, luto@kernel.org,
        rjw@rjwysocki.net, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
        peterz@infradead.org, zhang.lyra@gmail.com,
        rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        mingo@kernel.org
Reply-To: hpa@zytor.com, vincent.wang@unisoc.com, luto@kernel.org,
          rjw@rjwysocki.net, tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de,
          riel@surriel.com, quentin.perret@arm.com,
          torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org,
          dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org,
          zhang.lyra@gmail.com, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com,
          linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20190305083202.GU32494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20190305083202.GU32494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
To:     linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip:sched/urgent] sched/cpufreq: Fix 32-bit math overflow
Git-Commit-ID: f1212844e9dc3a31d41f99713c5522acf92ff291
Robot-ID: <tip-bot.git.kernel.org>
Robot-Unsubscribe: Contact <mailto:hpa@kernel.org> to get blacklisted from
 these emails
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Commit-ID:  f1212844e9dc3a31d41f99713c5522acf92ff291
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/f1212844e9dc3a31d41f99713c5522acf92ff291
Author:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
AuthorDate: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 09:32:02 +0100
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Sat, 9 Mar 2019 14:03:51 +0100

sched/cpufreq: Fix 32-bit math overflow

Vincent Wang reported that get_next_freq() has a mult overflow bug on
32-bit platforms in the IOWAIT boost case, since in that case {util,max}
are in freq units instead of capacity units.

Solve this by moving the IOWAIT boost to capacity units. And since this
means @max is constant; simplify the code.

Reported-by: Vincent Wang <vincent.wang@unisoc.com>
Tested-by: Vincent Wang <vincent.wang@unisoc.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190305083202.GU32494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 033ec7c45f13..5a8932ee5112 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -48,10 +48,10 @@ struct sugov_cpu {
 
 	bool			iowait_boost_pending;
 	unsigned int		iowait_boost;
-	unsigned int		iowait_boost_max;
 	u64			last_update;
 
 	unsigned long		bw_dl;
+	unsigned long		min;
 	unsigned long		max;
 
 	/* The field below is for single-CPU policies only: */
@@ -303,8 +303,7 @@ static bool sugov_iowait_reset(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time,
 	if (delta_ns <= TICK_NSEC)
 		return false;
 
-	sg_cpu->iowait_boost = set_iowait_boost
-		? sg_cpu->sg_policy->policy->min : 0;
+	sg_cpu->iowait_boost = set_iowait_boost ? sg_cpu->min : 0;
 	sg_cpu->iowait_boost_pending = set_iowait_boost;
 
 	return true;
@@ -344,14 +343,12 @@ static void sugov_iowait_boost(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time,
 
 	/* Double the boost at each request */
 	if (sg_cpu->iowait_boost) {
-		sg_cpu->iowait_boost <<= 1;
-		if (sg_cpu->iowait_boost > sg_cpu->iowait_boost_max)
-			sg_cpu->iowait_boost = sg_cpu->iowait_boost_max;
+		sg_cpu->iowait_boost = min(sg_cpu->iowait_boost << 1, SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE);
 		return;
 	}
 
 	/* First wakeup after IO: start with minimum boost */
-	sg_cpu->iowait_boost = sg_cpu->sg_policy->policy->min;
+	sg_cpu->iowait_boost = sg_cpu->min;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -373,47 +370,38 @@ static void sugov_iowait_boost(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time,
  * This mechanism is designed to boost high frequently IO waiting tasks, while
  * being more conservative on tasks which does sporadic IO operations.
  */
-static void sugov_iowait_apply(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time,
-			       unsigned long *util, unsigned long *max)
+static unsigned long sugov_iowait_apply(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time,
+					unsigned long util, unsigned long max)
 {
-	unsigned int boost_util, boost_max;
+	unsigned long boost;
 
 	/* No boost currently required */
 	if (!sg_cpu->iowait_boost)
-		return;
+		return util;
 
 	/* Reset boost if the CPU appears to have been idle enough */
 	if (sugov_iowait_reset(sg_cpu, time, false))
-		return;
+		return util;
 
-	/*
-	 * An IO waiting task has just woken up:
-	 * allow to further double the boost value
-	 */
-	if (sg_cpu->iowait_boost_pending) {
-		sg_cpu->iowait_boost_pending = false;
-	} else {
+	if (!sg_cpu->iowait_boost_pending) {
 		/*
-		 * Otherwise: reduce the boost value and disable it when we
-		 * reach the minimum.
+		 * No boost pending; reduce the boost value.
 		 */
 		sg_cpu->iowait_boost >>= 1;
-		if (sg_cpu->iowait_boost < sg_cpu->sg_policy->policy->min) {
+		if (sg_cpu->iowait_boost < sg_cpu->min) {
 			sg_cpu->iowait_boost = 0;
-			return;
+			return util;
 		}
 	}
 
+	sg_cpu->iowait_boost_pending = false;
+
 	/*
-	 * Apply the current boost value: a CPU is boosted only if its current
-	 * utilization is smaller then the current IO boost level.
+	 * @util is already in capacity scale; convert iowait_boost
+	 * into the same scale so we can compare.
 	 */
-	boost_util = sg_cpu->iowait_boost;
-	boost_max = sg_cpu->iowait_boost_max;
-	if (*util * boost_max < *max * boost_util) {
-		*util = boost_util;
-		*max = boost_max;
-	}
+	boost = (sg_cpu->iowait_boost * max) >> SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT;
+	return max(boost, util);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
@@ -460,7 +448,7 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
 
 	util = sugov_get_util(sg_cpu);
 	max = sg_cpu->max;
-	sugov_iowait_apply(sg_cpu, time, &util, &max);
+	util = sugov_iowait_apply(sg_cpu, time, util, max);
 	next_f = get_next_freq(sg_policy, util, max);
 	/*
 	 * Do not reduce the frequency if the CPU has not been idle
@@ -500,7 +488,7 @@ static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shared(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time)
 
 		j_util = sugov_get_util(j_sg_cpu);
 		j_max = j_sg_cpu->max;
-		sugov_iowait_apply(j_sg_cpu, time, &j_util, &j_max);
+		j_util = sugov_iowait_apply(j_sg_cpu, time, j_util, j_max);
 
 		if (j_util * max > j_max * util) {
 			util = j_util;
@@ -837,7 +825,9 @@ static int sugov_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 		memset(sg_cpu, 0, sizeof(*sg_cpu));
 		sg_cpu->cpu			= cpu;
 		sg_cpu->sg_policy		= sg_policy;
-		sg_cpu->iowait_boost_max	= policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
+		sg_cpu->min			=
+			(SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE * policy->cpuinfo.min_freq) /
+			policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
 	}
 
 	for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus) {