Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc:     linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        ulf.hansson@linaro.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
        broonie@kernel.org, bfq-iosched@googlegroups.com,
        oleksandr@natalenko.name, fra.fra.800@gmail.com,
        alessio.masola@gmail.com, Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH BUGFIX IMPROVEMENT V2 5/9] block, bfq: do not tag totally seeky queues as soft rt
Date:   Sun, 10 Mar 2019 19:11:33 +0100
Message-Id: <20190310181137.2604-6-paolo.valente@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190310181137.2604-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org>
References: <20190310181137.2604-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Sync random I/O is likely to be confused with soft real-time I/O,
because it is characterized by limited throughput and apparently
isochronous arrival pattern. To avoid false positives, this commits
prevents bfq_queues containing only random (seeky) I/O from being
tagged as soft real-time.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
---
 block/bfq-iosched.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index b96be3764b8a..d34b80e5c47d 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -242,6 +242,14 @@ static struct kmem_cache *bfq_pool;
 	  blk_rq_sectors(rq) < BFQQ_SECT_THR_NONROT))
 #define BFQQ_CLOSE_THR		(sector_t)(8 * 1024)
 #define BFQQ_SEEKY(bfqq)	(hweight32(bfqq->seek_history) > 19)
+/*
+ * Sync random I/O is likely to be confused with soft real-time I/O,
+ * because it is characterized by limited throughput and apparently
+ * isochronous arrival pattern. To avoid false positives, queues
+ * containing only random (seeky) I/O are prevented from being tagged
+ * as soft real-time.
+ */
+#define BFQQ_TOTALLY_SEEKY(bfqq)	(bfqq->seek_history & -1)
 
 /* Min number of samples required to perform peak-rate update */
 #define BFQ_RATE_MIN_SAMPLES	32
@@ -1622,6 +1630,7 @@ static void bfq_bfqq_handle_idle_busy_switch(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
 	 */
 	in_burst = bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq);
 	soft_rt = bfqd->bfq_wr_max_softrt_rate > 0 &&
+		!BFQQ_TOTALLY_SEEKY(bfqq) &&
 		!in_burst &&
 		time_is_before_jiffies(bfqq->soft_rt_next_start) &&
 		bfqq->dispatched == 0;
@@ -4816,6 +4825,11 @@ bfq_update_io_seektime(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
 {
 	bfqq->seek_history <<= 1;
 	bfqq->seek_history |= BFQ_RQ_SEEKY(bfqd, bfqq->last_request_pos, rq);
+
+	if (bfqq->wr_coeff > 1 &&
+	    bfqq->wr_cur_max_time == bfqd->bfq_wr_rt_max_time &&
+	    BFQQ_TOTALLY_SEEKY(bfqq))
+		bfq_bfqq_end_wr(bfqq);
 }
 
 static void bfq_update_has_short_ttime(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
-- 
2.20.1