Received: by 2002:ac0:950c:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id f12csp1458139imc; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:20:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyl1PG5vbYtdS+WIG5XeklR0vQhnVnSfeJ7bK/HeTXrBlm8+rt5+9Pxuo195NZIfy0z5NCj X-Received: by 2002:a63:f544:: with SMTP id e4mr14777847pgk.145.1552339224245; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:20:24 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1552339224; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=PMn30hnqLc4cFGYv2OJ5BU0AEHy91fOyRfi2LkCWRsOehyPDz7WDhoHkGz2ivK5jwK ZaXkgvPeiNdciSfkn7jIb/Zv345rAh/XhxCtxR5Qz9DUEw5ZDX/0qv38Jihai6/od6zc ZDS4cg3YLnCvtLjd+vywup+AI4eNWdJm9F115Pj9mp17Uv+Cp2QOQqk6Ynx8Wd1u2Wur K+ppynEUfZ/CbVw9d/52f7EYE8bmzuiI2i7hTt79PdiIhrzJWAUOjz3Arxs7ICOtTO4M eGK2VxQknQQul5hiEqzBX1AG2vy1RCu+PE3G6BeSE8E11u5ZJI4IlLOT6Gu79t5dpBR6 O9TA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:date:from:dkim-signature; bh=a1CkLVQN7fsFZjnCZ7nbjyE056wbgyuDJaErJU2QKR8=; b=jkgY7sIuCctMuspCHHPWdMrSMpAq21KL/UYxF9Zmob3OUlyzg7r9joYEx+jQQbV0IM xCHeHfAkw4aOKzzwzyJY/F+GEn0ViZrwteYzTipQJeLvhJ8jrdbx32rlVJDTd/68SZr/ H9ubiJ05Yzg0YgdbC/24tpwjLziaXrXZtH35rRFCpfX/1BXufWxwcnnxq+vhPg24xROa lAuu53+zeiOkkufDwVUFG4Lf6nON89ZNH0E1OEzMOEmwZVwFpWtP5tIf9Y2gIWqvAljI 86FCWJ8sXCr8+gNpgohE+q4GVd2cvgYhqecbhECf3auT+mHwZsklVm0ja4g9PFPJjv7a b8UA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=bAqmkhvc; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b17si5883286pfm.57.2019.03.11.14.20.08; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:20:24 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=bAqmkhvc; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728517AbfCKVS5 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:18:57 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f195.google.com ([209.85.160.195]:43729 "EHLO mail-qt1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728173AbfCKVS5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:18:57 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f195.google.com with SMTP id d16so224138qtn.10; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:18:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=a1CkLVQN7fsFZjnCZ7nbjyE056wbgyuDJaErJU2QKR8=; b=bAqmkhvcW35zJBGK/0PHnXmIh5MvXEULQmAjEAlQQVBlzGVKRxlh6SZHzOk44RbbMD Avd72XGmbUQZ7ax6yP9gmQDO7DhQVa8ee1RjqOtjlm5mILOhr4CRHN7z+UNPDrI4cjht 5oP+3CclJgGiCzvh8UGgsDzKJ30lwv9d8XFYmtP9md1VjoCn0zdf9/+N83sAk2RTiASI HQ5Bo2HscQExi6bn0ww5PlnrTWcGA6FLX7zn1JoI0k9HUrrDeqTa8Shdm9OHn424+WIw oiPb4vjwr7JzVOU7zMgMBOlDnr4Xpdw+V29qYotdfACXzB/8JwBAb3z9uv17SbRwYSwK JQZg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=a1CkLVQN7fsFZjnCZ7nbjyE056wbgyuDJaErJU2QKR8=; b=JcrtxjA5Xzxp1q39Ew+JTQ/uyoWh+zR9iYWEpNj93SxcteulATK+NlKh96x7jL8RKi MR9q4gd2QBIcuvC81KQ+2yO21a7ApWj6w9UJuSAfi2WtGCo0mi8T6SXqOTVJdeuFLRzD xMwpsReeP7npCjqbVqfSWDx4ME88OIfk23nQSZ46WwrKWXExuqy66UTQ6UxQB/KZQx/x gczOYJWNs22hzA5pJPMx4resr/ThgCpbEC49lDuTWHAiY4YJCVVWLGTEcGiS/D3K46g9 w4WGC6q1ZQBLd6FBQOrlK4f7ZZcy0w99F0toODROadDmf7kVVDS6Jm/Vo24VoE/Io59C toTw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVTWA6s6hmYXaAc3Q6/wRC6n74yG46qmzzR2Iax8Xrt2t3Q1VhF VRMS5srbjKtM7mIHZ+y/giI= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:2a82:: with SMTP id b2mr27463197qta.375.1552339135340; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:18:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from quaco.ghostprotocols.net ([190.15.121.82]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j34sm4079738qte.49.2019.03.11.14.18.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:18:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo X-Google-Original-From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Received: by quaco.ghostprotocols.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0EAE14039C; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 18:18:52 -0300 (-03) Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 18:18:51 -0300 To: Song Liu Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , "bpf@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "ast@kernel.org" , "daniel@iogearbox.net" , Kernel Team , "peterz@infradead.org" , "jolsa@kernel.org" , "namhyung@kernel.org" , "sdf@fomichev.me" Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 perf,bpf 00/15] perf annotation of BPF programs Message-ID: <20190311211851.GB4939@kernel.org> References: <20190311195555.889995-1-songliubraving@fb.com> <20190311202414.GA3078@redhat.com> <20190311210507.GF10690@kernel.org> <944EE4E6-FD71-4D41-ABE1-279C6950EB11@fb.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <944EE4E6-FD71-4D41-ABE1-279C6950EB11@fb.com> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 09:08:31PM +0000, Song Liu escreveu: > > On Mar 11, 2019, at 2:05 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 09:01:48PM +0000, Song Liu escreveu: > >>> On Mar 11, 2019, at 1:24 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > >>> These csets are already upstream, i.e. already hit torvalds/master, i.e. > >>> will be in 5.1, can you check that we still need doing this > >>> cherry-picking? > >> I just checked that 02-15 of the set could apply to torvalds/master (with > >> some minor conflicts), and it works as expected. > > So no need to cherrypick, just use torvalds/master as a base, ok. > Do you want me to resend the set with the conflict resolved? No need for today, I think Jiri is looking at that branch I saw you guys chatting today, so if he has some new comments, you can then address and repost, fixing the conflicts then. - Arnaldo