Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190220085607.31582-1-peng.ma@nxp.com> <20190222143931.GA17132@bogus>
 <VI1PR04MB44312525A43E259CE9CC45F9ED480@VI1PR04MB4431.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR04MB44312525A43E259CE9CC45F9ED480@VI1PR04MB4431.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
From:   Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:39:36 -0500
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+tBSw0d6=A6CS3=tWn7k4WX-KAeLBaoJ6019uGc-PRUg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [v6 1/3] dt-bindings: ahci-fsl-qoriq: add lx2160a chip name to
 the list
To:     Peng Ma <peng.ma@nxp.com>
Cc:     "axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
        "mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        "shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
        Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>, Andy Tang <andy.tang@nxp.com>,
        "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Mian Yousaf Kaukab <yousaf.kaukab@suse.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 1:57 AM Peng Ma <peng.ma@nxp.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,

Please don't top post to mail lists.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

>
> Thanks for your comments, I don't understand what you said.
> This patch is one of the series patchs(http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-ide/list/?series=93099&archive=both&state=*) for review.
> There is not changed for 6th version of this patch.

I reviewed v5 and gave my Reviewed-by. When you posted v6, you should
have added the tag so the maintainer applying this series doesn't have
to look at prior versions to collect tags and so I don't have to
review this again and can ignore it.

Rob