Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263413AbUCTNxW (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Mar 2004 08:53:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263414AbUCTNxW (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Mar 2004 08:53:22 -0500 Received: from 153.Red-213-4-13.pooles.rima-tde.net ([213.4.13.153]:45573 "EHLO kerberos.felipe-alfaro.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263413AbUCTNxV (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Mar 2004 08:53:21 -0500 Subject: Re: [CFT,PATCH] cpu detection for 2.6.5-rc1-mm2 From: Felipe Alfaro Solana To: Manfred Spraul Cc: Kernel Mailinglist In-Reply-To: <4059F0EF.6070706@colorfullife.com> References: <4059F0EF.6070706@colorfullife.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1079790733.866.0.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-1) Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 14:52:13 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 838 Lines: 20 On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 19:56, Manfred Spraul wrote: > xHi all, > > 2.6.5-rc1-mm2 contains new slab code that is more memory efficient by > setting (and thus reducing) the alignment of the objects based on the > actual cpu cache line size. This means that the cpu identification must > be done far earlier than before and that caused the boot problems with > 2.6.5-mm1. > > Attached is a new proposal against 2.6.5-rc1-mm2 - could you give it a > try? It's tested with Pentium 4, bochs (i.e. Intel Pentium) and Athlon > XP cpus. Works fine here where 2.6.5-rc1-mm1 failed miserably ;-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/