Received: by 2002:ac0:950c:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id f12csp1881766imc; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 02:37:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxEpeVhuuCQS+iSRilR7M5bEPzpW56uGyeyiflzOBmGzg5xKjBomtSP5TQXn+alf69bZZj9 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:2ec1:: with SMTP id r59mr1919501plb.171.1552383428023; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 02:37:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1552383428; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=x4fsl0vKOok5nfyw4/7pi8ZIJEiiO2vS2lJ9s03LAHHcVe4ECFzFn7yy6dW/ojFDr5 YzHjfUJY3BdWx9bpESvTDGlVKsxI0M1sFeI5pPyQuE4XPfSie2Qx9sq5dOEthYNUWFlR 5GLgi6EG2sP0YTwEZNntEVgL37mD320pthDRH7vWRNFP+QkFcv/ERc0e6QGyZnN73dV5 7X5O3budrh1YmPTi5Bn8BZ+UiZh+KcOBW9sTS+gKDsQlPM5GVW+NKgsas3Fa3wnL7wQ2 w3egjRSVuFW9W67qSSNfpqe62rqw9Gez3vhash/zzaMiMX/ECEVezMlvMHkT1ovbjR5X Xzfw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=BPYxN4cvUVjTLq6adpD+hkVjKR+C4kmufX0TRKSyCsI=; b=IVZObOBJ8UnnjAioYiketnj2LIYeOQK9Q0n95mhwhkSvvObklN+lQYzVf8hNfrJE/t uF4/A8P2fuIoArc9zEExBCaIBq9Y7pUg9pttfIOSuDuQSJAiVIXExhlkdkTiPMwXJn5S AK+n/xgtLSCAou6nLc0kEQOhrHE+U7armuzq7lwDJz7swOJEJkpFgBo67mRNX6tPFPuU TpaeP6/iRDY/havA7XFVj4AyTtXtBFh1FY+Wma41GEFVfDDbcBmPXbKlhs91Ur49PgPL 2IdbDf/pG1J2cPDvPt+hGeDbJR0YcRAhDtqorEXFU9/qUSc3Ki/UF5EPuNgTP/FnLum+ BnyA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=eDUdImna; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g4si6940208pgi.380.2019.03.12.02.36.52; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 02:37:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=eDUdImna; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726733AbfCLJel (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 12 Mar 2019 05:34:41 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f195.google.com ([209.85.210.195]:38315 "EHLO mail-pf1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726452AbfCLJel (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Mar 2019 05:34:41 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f195.google.com with SMTP id n125so1400538pfn.5 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 02:34:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=BPYxN4cvUVjTLq6adpD+hkVjKR+C4kmufX0TRKSyCsI=; b=eDUdImnaxomiTKtFloiIoMcubwQt7tjptJNw0Aq1wTm5i01v5CIoxZtwHFcWVFWvAy baviP5ho+35p6q0M4EfryeJAg3PqVhVK/tvyyNjtcjkQKnfN4dAlUK1sCSIgpnyHo0OW 6ZjbQEN+/TUTmmvLsalmGI+0da9SXS8Nox8ETN6LoZnyQ2PMdXTZHnkRh7U13RluISPs Bv2JRVuNmwT7yL2To8x+yhFJDKCuvK0hQLOGO0sOcb8OJdXaoWRPiOMtVtJuk3u6KR5B sE0HqEbbfPwg2yj3tAHWK89tGMvmWAGF5rrL7Kc2+qPsB8n9Jj3k4lJRRQW49sf2yEuV NtZw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=BPYxN4cvUVjTLq6adpD+hkVjKR+C4kmufX0TRKSyCsI=; b=acc8WRo3RlJxcigNo34c3DRtckJ6mAZHyzG1axhGWgUgtwhwAXFJE46w5+W+8NOr3T Wsso2s1h3tCCjx691ckiTRtCXQUe0Ix3uJOHgKdkswMHCReQ5NXKXRNakeqZNtEU5opc xZj9iPo51jhZkQ12H3BWgpmjr98EoycP2eW3TuoD486E1Q5CaH3r0bR/pvLYQ3/wRYrT rfZ6yNIVvaQFUA4QgnEb9fW0FH6mrcLMk1EhvC6ciCqyVOEK6SsgqUs7zhSYfU7bxgvr SngiBRdMdi2d2zsoYY8JAj7WhyeqjAQna8CCd2dyvel9mnZ63t/qM8LuvDA59ddhVpJb 6OfQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWHjjm3pnviP0yGOkAiGC9J/ZVqlZhCqa+SjEc4ln/SgIbsbco5 Dr+HCelDarwbi2qWjHJIvyE= X-Received: by 2002:a62:4214:: with SMTP id p20mr12143583pfa.204.1552383280034; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 02:34:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([175.223.49.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d6sm12263572pfg.47.2019.03.12.02.34.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 12 Mar 2019 02:34:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 18:34:35 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: Petr Mladek Cc: Andrew Morton , "Ahmed S. Darwish" , Sergey Senozhatsky , Steven Rostedt , John Ogness , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: kmsg_dump: Mark registered flag as private Message-ID: <20190312093435.GA15673@jagdpanzerIV> References: <20190310200302.GA11096@darwi-home-pc> <20190311124905.GA416@tigerII.localdomain> <20190312091810.gm6q7ao6u2lpsnqh@pathway.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190312091810.gm6q7ao6u2lpsnqh@pathway.suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On (03/12/19 10:18), Petr Mladek wrote: > > > * @max_reason: filter for highest reason number that should be dumped > > > - * @registered: Flag that specifies if this is already registered > > > + * @registered: Flag that specifies if this is already registered (private) > > > */ > > > struct kmsg_dumper { > > > struct list_head list; > > [..] > This is another field in the same structure. There are 4 other fields > that are described as private by extra comment. Thefore this patch > might make it more consistent. Well, no objections from my side. At the same time nothing in kmsg_dump.h suggests that "(private)" stands for "protected by logbuf_lock". Even more, that struct has another "private" members, which are protected by logbuf_lock - cur_idx, next_idx, cur_srq, next_seq; except when they are not (see kmsg_dump_get_line_nolock() and other _nolock() functions). So "private" has conflicting meanings. struct kmsg_dumper { struct list_head list; void (*dump)(struct kmsg_dumper *dumper, enum kmsg_dump_reason reason); enum kmsg_dump_reason max_reason; bool active; bool registered; /* private state of the kmsg iterator */ u32 cur_idx; u32 next_idx; u64 cur_seq; u64 next_seq; }; > > Well, I am not sure if it is worth it. Andrew? > Agreed. -ss