Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:40:29 +0100
From:   Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To:     John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Daniel Wang <wonderfly@google.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>,
        Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>,
        linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 00/25] printk: new implementation
Message-ID: <20190313084028.f2m4qhxd5sjzzawr@linutronix.de>
References: <20190212143003.48446-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de>
 <20190213025520.GA5803@jagdpanzerIV>
 <874l9721hf.fsf@linutronix.de>
 <20190304052335.GA6648@jagdpanzerIV>
 <87lg1rggcz.fsf@linutronix.de>
 <20190311105411.GA368@jagdpanzerIV>
 <20190312123857.juatd6fwtfmqajze@pathway.suse.cz>
 <874l8815uc.fsf@linutronix.de>
 <20190313021534.GB783@jagdpanzerIV>
 <87d0mv9off.fsf@linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87d0mv9off.fsf@linutronix.de>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2019-03-13 09:19:32 [+0100], John Ogness wrote:
> recursive situation. As you are pointing out, the notification/wake
> component of printk_safe will still be needed. I will leave that (small)
> part in printk_safe.c.

Does this mean we keep irq_work part or we bury it and solve it by other
means?

> John Ogness

Sebastian