Received: by 2002:ac0:950c:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id f12csp3043428imc; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 07:33:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwJ7f1S9NHT1Q/yBcf4q2i3L3lb0KE3pej0zssvFH+7fcNaT6+HeIxAMQpAzTdsimvfRGYX X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e85:: with SMTP id 5mr46330610plx.13.1552487623593; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 07:33:43 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1552487623; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OSvYWOYXhhI3gcGnbCE5JKjA9t1/pyrIQxYWyZknYZ+xTBv6GuFD8bQb2EYnHF+DWE RQLiLTD6MHhrMikJjnGAEdGoYBURouJFn1Q37seZfjpj9IBjhQLQxicAPJqcB5MXIAi2 aFTq8MiT+jKrwCGsFntLNOqCA7g3EgTDQ9de7eZAbwG5hiQga4S/fJ1JoayhXnn9MWYr 1iqWlXQxMNyC/T8gfNuTfSVOae17Abuw55BRzCz9gBa2vt25mECJXQ+JxZmIIUN62a3Q DzH1RPey9vuztNX5bs07itzOP5zzlVFkBf/8Mx5OXajM0c7TrlhIa41OCchfU2jNot98 wsjQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=l4y3uyx9OFx08MnbvVoBjf1QMWF43hx5TE5qEzJ65l8=; b=fKP8umIJXy5JAbMAdn7OfnBmZAONyRxXY0eehSU7KMtR1unBE0LNokngett+IXAFAn kiG2Aax2xFuvOrDYi7k7Bl6ON0pDBFSbkRDWkk5XSDjz1+d3GM2dVZZkoCN2ySeH8AZF e5XEVp6KI4lGf3pHq6vxjar+bMzTpqnPMxi3w4A9kEQQKsd17cM35xLG6pbH3yN339JT l6qzWpQJKrx+DLEkc12AH5x2k9UfgFwD398akJWBpT4oHxughD84s4Dx4fldaERzABzS rKHNvx2iMYFjHYboxGWvOUkK6MuTNibZZB/Gf1iFXefoOKBexjH6m5DP26uqHn1LR+Pv n5Hg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@infradead.org header.s=bombadil.20170209 header.b=EhgUOilA; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org> Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j5si9918548pfi.227.2019.03.13.07.33.26; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 07:33:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@infradead.org header.s=bombadil.20170209 header.b=EhgUOilA; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726686AbfCMOcr (ORCPT <rfc822;michael.k.kehoe@gmail.com> + 99 others); Wed, 13 Mar 2019 10:32:47 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:44716 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726033AbfCMOcr (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 13 Mar 2019 10:32:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=l4y3uyx9OFx08MnbvVoBjf1QMWF43hx5TE5qEzJ65l8=; b=EhgUOilAsh89BK/UGoRir5+2L JWBLCMbScO9AA/REYxTunmHkol0X/caW8qpAJ9MAFUIWApVNhHDhfHgtFYpPj9CqwZk0frVwNhVhX Ah8UUpsUpSKGXCUD4/tx/pJHUNnVlwWJzyCCKttGH/t6coPy0ZcorVaknhr9zdOrK4wjl5zcIbWfM TGPOb5ud+BP2RnmbDhvEINC9qVw3/+8QYLBRpSli7Ru1Wbqs3Oz9l9b7j9BP8deK/QhEsWzSFXZHT 6Kt42pz88yBhSbwX7+clqyJfy/e0Y6fVAltoWPl0yAVA2AW8WM1A5OMLHMLb8osYz8d5CLRSmDa9f J/cH65usw==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1h44vx-0004j2-Q2; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 14:32:41 +0000 Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4B247202989D2; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 15:32:40 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 15:32:40 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> To: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>, Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>, Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>, Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 03/15] sched/core: uclamp: Add system default clamps Message-ID: <20190313143240.GH5922@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20190208100554.32196-1-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> <20190208100554.32196-4-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190208100554.32196-4-patrick.bellasi@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 10:05:42AM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h > index 45460e7a3eee..447261cd23ba 100644 > --- a/include/linux/sched.h > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h > @@ -584,14 +584,32 @@ struct sched_dl_entity { > * Utilization clamp for a scheduling entity > * @value: clamp value "requested" by a se > * @bucket_id: clamp bucket corresponding to the "requested" value > + * @effective: clamp value and bucket actually "assigned" to the se > + * @active: the se is currently refcounted in a rq's bucket > * > + * Both bucket_id and effective::bucket_id are the index of the clamp bucket > + * matching the corresponding clamp value which are pre-computed and stored to > + * avoid expensive integer divisions from the fast path. > + * > + * The active bit is set whenever a task has got an effective::value assigned, > + * which can be different from the user requested clamp value. This allows to > + * know a task is actually refcounting the rq's effective::bucket_id bucket. > */ > struct uclamp_se { > + /* Clamp value "requested" by a scheduling entity */ > unsigned int value : bits_per(SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE); > unsigned int bucket_id : bits_per(UCLAMP_BUCKETS); > + unsigned int active : 1; > + /* > + * Clamp value "obtained" by a scheduling entity. > + * > + * This cache the actual clamp value, possibly enforced by system > + * default clamps, a task is subject to while enqueued in a rq. > + */ > + struct { > + unsigned int value : bits_per(SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE); > + unsigned int bucket_id : bits_per(UCLAMP_BUCKETS); > + } effective; I still think that this effective thing is backwards. The existing code already used @value and @bucket_id as 'effective' and you're now changing all that again. This really doesn't make sense to me. Also; if you don't add it inside struct uclamp_se, but add a second instance, > }; > #endif /* CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK */ > > @@ -803,6 +811,70 @@ static inline void uclamp_rq_update(struct rq *rq, unsigned int clamp_id, > WRITE_ONCE(rq->uclamp[clamp_id].value, max_value); > } > > +/* > + * The effective clamp bucket index of a task depends on, by increasing > + * priority: > + * - the task specific clamp value, when explicitly requested from userspace > + * - the system default clamp value, defined by the sysadmin > + * > + * As a side effect, update the task's effective value: > + * task_struct::uclamp::effective::value > + * to represent the clamp value of the task effective bucket index. > + */ > +static inline void > +uclamp_effective_get(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int clamp_id, > + unsigned int *clamp_value, unsigned int *bucket_id) > +{ > + /* Task specific clamp value */ > + *bucket_id = p->uclamp[clamp_id].bucket_id; > + *clamp_value = p->uclamp[clamp_id].value; > + > + /* Always apply system default restrictions */ > + if (unlikely(*clamp_value > uclamp_default[clamp_id].value)) { > + *clamp_value = uclamp_default[clamp_id].value; > + *bucket_id = uclamp_default[clamp_id].bucket_id; > + } > +} you can avoid horrors like this and simply return a struct uclamp_se by value.