Received: by 2002:ac0:950c:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id f12csp3869437imc; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 07:08:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxuYyv6wU7MQhVKe2RGjHrfF8zYhKJs6dQsyvsRtjOQqFb2zXxvT7KtEqrURsXgq9XMLbGU X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:1121:: with SMTP id d30mr6648565pla.104.1552572537026; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 07:08:57 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1552572537; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CfW/BmgkRIgFOwoHyWZb117sANhYCwhpYj678hN1fzzB35D3T8gbZUOajf7xF/lH3l +oVxHbql03FWxjfFKXK+6ap5hLtJ+uDl2b1pB/10PoQCX5QlfNmsuILwjZMSXmBUQ6zx qy3foEktndyheQWi9mlSOir9/B8JpUKYDt7tNuwDgQ+cbIY7BnZSFXhH12SFIIllFjVx XEFUa85aXspcTNkMFcKQxzacOMvznZ1zuF6aY4Lp6Sl+Ie1bHn0m1a/7JcRqr6oGIQKV UoDtxxuTPUks5PzSGAB+utWrpDD31iN4iMsJ/h5DCqbTa0TrJf3VibSpxPYqyp5wciGM bpQg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date; bh=AVPQtLbWIGExsb/zWPXiCkSjbRqFxA6U3NfIwx2z9po=; b=NHkD/lVos8IHvblUY7X+Xao8QZ3OSjObCe+I6ngCpgv6HnXuPCGM9iF9WmFo1m7luo jTnLmI++EEPcx22T2NJi0qQLIDvRvy7Rknc86cBuc6EFSTWrq97zuMZNdE61VpfN+1vt MW7brnzWb0PkHXB3MqjYKgYx5kIy+L8qqudoKa0zqDbAleK1ES6EvN/wigLyPtQFoGU3 9ONmOA74QbrzmGQglDG5LXLHKv2J0Cb+GFM35rJDF9A/b/nQI3FX7sEHAOgQ7ASuc0mW R/ANoQtT3V7v0KMfwNS/wRgl0SQVFLfF2VTCGoM9TQOtcigm0h790RSUPiaaGJNWRe7F XDaQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o1si5403950pld.439.2019.03.14.07.08.41; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 07:08:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727786AbfCNOHl (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 14 Mar 2019 10:07:41 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:40192 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727777AbfCNOHl (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Mar 2019 10:07:41 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E75EAB6D; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 14:07:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 15:07:37 +0100 From: Jean Delvare To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Armando Miraglia , neil@brown.name, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, sankalpnegi2310@gmail.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, sr@denx.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: mediatek: Attempt to address style issues in spi-mt7621.c Message-ID: <20190314150737.61eed622@endymion> In-Reply-To: <20190314112732.GJ2227@kadam> References: <20190313122403.248873-1-armax@google.com> <20190313123454.GB2202@kadam> <20190314111313.GB8034@google.com> <20190314112732.GJ2227@kadam> Organization: SUSE Linux X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Dan, On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 14:27:32 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 12:13:15PM +0100, Armando Miraglia wrote: > > Is there an explicit intent to deprecate Lindent in favor of checkpatch.pl > > --fix? If one would like to contribute to fixing the tooling for linting which > > of the two would be the right target for such an effort? > > I've added Jean to the CC list because he worked on Lindent a few > years ago. I really think we should just delete Lindent. I haven't > used the checkpatch.pl --fix option but Joe Perches has good style. I merely fixed obvious but minor issues in Lindent as I stumbled upon them the one time in my life I used that script. That was years ago. I'm not using it on a regular basis. My principle is that if a script is present in the kernel tree then it can and should be maintained. If it is deemed not worth the maintenance effort then it should be deleted. I don't care either way. -- Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support