Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190314130113.919278615@infradead.org> <CABPqkBT9_ayhH2puPtLiemtM=VOXxNhC4AXrKkOaDMatWifLxQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABPqkBT9_ayhH2puPtLiemtM=VOXxNhC4AXrKkOaDMatWifLxQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:15:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CABPqkBRkPQewqJQsNtEESd9Jo2qd8iVG7KDzbQRK_Lg_21p-bA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/8] perf/x86: event scheduling cleanups
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, tonyj@suse.com,
        nelson.dsouza@intel.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 12:15 AM Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 6:11 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > These here patches are the result of chasing a bug in the TSX Force Abort
> > patches.
> >
> > The first patch is simple and fixes the issue and should be marked /urgent and
> > backported.
> >
> > The rest is the result of having a hard look at how all that event scheduling
> > stuff worked while trying to figure out wth was going wrong.
> >
> > Stephane, since you were involved with writing much of that code, can you
> > please have a good look? I _think_ I got it, but... :-)
> >
> Will do today.
> But you did not send me PATCH 1/8 apparently.

Correction : I got it. Mail client had just moved it somewhere else!