Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 15 Mar 2019 14:57:24 +0100
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>, tglx@linutronix.de,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Allow to eliminate softirq processing from rcutree
Message-ID: <20190315135724.anljnrwgouamz2iy@linutronix.de>
References: <20190315111130.4902-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
 <20190315093544.2bfe93f6@gandalf.local.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190315093544.2bfe93f6@gandalf.local.home>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 2019-03-15 09:35:44 [-0400], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 12:11:30 +0100
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:
> 
> > +static void rcu_cpu_kthread_park(unsigned int cpu)
> > +{
> 
> Should we add one of the trace_rcu_.. trace events here?

If it is required and I'm told which one it is then sure I can add it.

> -- Steve

Sebastian