Received: by 2002:ac0:bc90:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp239953img; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 01:59:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzV1LafbJuBCr9kq3HoSeCT0jnVmT03aWmEk9H/pMEGvDoV0G53hxR32YadelNxBZnA3Xcs X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6a4:: with SMTP id 33mr18842871plh.140.1552899550893; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 01:59:10 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1552899550; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=g8GKIglZRPRVDl9GN/SFR6MTcYyyNbhRTlEyYswDUQ0LtPL72seEh/bePiS/59WCj4 cbZvTM/fRaIB9ke+R9Xe+5hgXDoMNshF88PKDelpbn1N1MAl6dzWLSwb0BFAjJWO6Udl k7wXBlKVNp9Buvl19GdY3IqdGyDqRt20uVEl4BYcoSNOFl7/Uiil7Lpgn1gRLDUt2PGn 2/kJNHOQnrvab/RphWIQcCDxsnjjmBSZg9vf7b3ZmIYf0Z5GUz33c9tP9bvL1EFuk4Gf AUAkC/9ealQpktc6DgyLvE+fVD5WOTkxrLC4O5h0pFq1r4GKvZAuaatdnuFMm20fn8AP 2FFA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=k8zTvxN+hP6jOUfAi1cELVLtcKNt2ez1O3ztkU6CQhY=; b=QzZREz1C6HcS0F1lLTZH6NraEljVkdSD9vEz4/GblthOgUz2udmaTok+oyY13e/0/o Tb/sAnF3aqGxpaLkhSbLl9MmWhEbLpE0hk8CTgY00cyR3YfcjUBlZr2Q2Obf193PGtTZ ZuDYH+Z4Xl8lCeOBqoU1WPJn653Zdme1qiv2np0TefVZhc+qqZhgrRcB0cYKeWkN2fUj 4G/UCn/CCDuBHWl0NlFrbZpjg+h8p8Wm3DPUmdUEZ3V9iBTQ4Q/5ChSgwfvXfxA36cBA phkrKu85snuhhL70LTSubSeqRQT2ecXmOnDs1OT3ou8dt0gNUVMbZEv40+0p0Jrj94jT hbTw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Uo25g4gE; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k24si8628051pgj.228.2019.03.18.01.58.55; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 01:59:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Uo25g4gE; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727237AbfCRI6B (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 18 Mar 2019 04:58:01 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f196.google.com ([209.85.215.196]:37773 "EHLO mail-pg1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727169AbfCRI56 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Mar 2019 04:57:58 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f196.google.com with SMTP id q206so10920431pgq.4 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 01:57:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=k8zTvxN+hP6jOUfAi1cELVLtcKNt2ez1O3ztkU6CQhY=; b=Uo25g4gEM+oDEUCCmIlbjt3cnIEVY1ntdo81ymMEHuV1TPUg9PV+BC4baKwxMO7INg cPRd5WOfhL7uxCytE2JAMEfVokW5iq8DTAdtq71Jf7I4ZXWFhUSZi5XkefnxUqoyJy3I yZVb5AxVWYqggQJg58rF4AvyFZaCVI8yHrn3guJTVzRVt2LKSOJlLpBNHnvfufFfULpo QNB//rdzovfJgC33XeX3uc/qCfKzl7XwEF5gsA/oZQESx4e6c4UWxfEtv35YKBVyN48l +ZbPUqhGUOE2snEiww9PpZmcXptATtCBOFqQ7uiWYeMT8q4ySjY776Ghj31LUqnJfFVp UCmw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=k8zTvxN+hP6jOUfAi1cELVLtcKNt2ez1O3ztkU6CQhY=; b=DsZ03D+ptQRmDMNMzFeXryTz7jooYWAimIOMQEMUiJIklMOvqxxaSsWkTIZ40rwZJ7 zu4kWUouKebDkr8MfLv+PmrQPz+3UhO2FBMxOcAf+GvGjIrx03nnD8X7LzKLFzYjHkYg sQWQI1sYSshzqNhMtRAIFK2HByDiTg67FOgRD/MiFKogyxeKx2bzTUOwL6v7j94RR3oR 7B9Dp2lFnuUBo+SNpSV1yvFQMcCylw2AL5U6EHYmALyXumi/56OR59fYk9nX4kFC9TM5 Vs5i7DzUzPJ7p2QaSCwCmgFprcBos/HBV0OC2qh6efMyxePAnLOlutkc2HWKRVHa4unR tVrg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUnOkDfb7T3f5ThsaCn2fQaSKcCbd/H0HrzMdEmxgBYSzczFkeL 0iqGqhZmvRENvzoOAfj4l/M= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:2aca:: with SMTP id j68mr18169231plb.233.1552899477549; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 01:57:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([203.100.54.194]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k8sm11147024pgq.37.2019.03.18.01.57.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 18 Mar 2019 01:57:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Yuyang Du To: peterz@infradead.org, will.deacon@arm.com, mingo@kernel.org Cc: bvanassche@acm.org, ming.lei@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yuyang Du Subject: [PATCH v2 05/19] locking/lockdep: Adjust indents for function definitions Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:57:19 +0800 Message-Id: <20190318085733.3143-6-duyuyang@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.2 (Apple Git-113) In-Reply-To: <20190318085733.3143-1-duyuyang@gmail.com> References: <20190318085733.3143-1-duyuyang@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Being paranoid to see function arguments lines are aligned. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du --- kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index dea495b..320ab62 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -1308,7 +1308,7 @@ static inline unsigned int __cq_get_elem_count(struct circular_queue *cq) } static inline void mark_lock_accessed(struct lock_list *lock, - struct lock_list *parent) + struct lock_list *parent) { unsigned long nr; @@ -1413,19 +1413,17 @@ static int __bfs(struct lock_list *source_entry, return ret; } -static inline int __bfs_forwards(struct lock_list *src_entry, - void *data, - int (*match)(struct lock_list *entry, void *data), - struct lock_list **target_entry) +static inline int __bfs_forwards(struct lock_list *src_entry, void *data, + int (*match)(struct lock_list *entry, void *data), + struct lock_list **target_entry) { return __bfs(src_entry, data, match, target_entry, 1); } -static inline int __bfs_backwards(struct lock_list *src_entry, - void *data, - int (*match)(struct lock_list *entry, void *data), - struct lock_list **target_entry) +static inline int __bfs_backwards(struct lock_list *src_entry, void *data, + int (*match)(struct lock_list *entry, void *data), + struct lock_list **target_entry) { return __bfs(src_entry, data, match, target_entry, 0); @@ -1507,8 +1505,8 @@ static void print_circular_lock_scenario(struct held_lock *src, */ static noinline void print_circular_bug_header(struct lock_list *entry, unsigned int depth, - struct held_lock *check_src, - struct held_lock *check_tgt) + struct held_lock *check_src, + struct held_lock *check_tgt) { struct task_struct *curr = current; @@ -1653,7 +1651,7 @@ unsigned long lockdep_count_backward_deps(struct lock_class *class) */ static noinline int check_noncircular(struct lock_list *root, struct lock_class *target, - struct lock_list **target_entry) + struct lock_list **target_entry) { int result; @@ -1703,7 +1701,7 @@ static inline int usage_match(struct lock_list *entry, void *bit) */ static int find_usage_forwards(struct lock_list *root, enum lock_usage_bit bit, - struct lock_list **target_entry) + struct lock_list **target_entry) { int result; @@ -1726,7 +1724,7 @@ static inline int usage_match(struct lock_list *entry, void *bit) */ static int find_usage_backwards(struct lock_list *root, enum lock_usage_bit bit, - struct lock_list **target_entry) + struct lock_list **target_entry) { int result; @@ -2018,7 +2016,7 @@ static int check_irq_usage(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev, static int check_prev_add_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev, - struct held_lock *next) + struct held_lock *next) { #define LOCKDEP_STATE(__STATE) \ if (!check_irq_usage(curr, prev, next, LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE)) \ @@ -2392,7 +2390,7 @@ struct lock_class *lock_chain_get_class(struct lock_chain *chain, int i) * Returns the index of the first held_lock of the current chain */ static inline int get_first_held_lock(struct task_struct *curr, - struct held_lock *hlock) + struct held_lock *hlock) { int i; struct held_lock *hlock_curr; @@ -2487,8 +2485,8 @@ static void print_collision(struct task_struct *curr, * Returns: 0 not passed, 1 passed */ static int check_no_collision(struct task_struct *curr, - struct held_lock *hlock, - struct lock_chain *chain) + struct held_lock *hlock, + struct lock_chain *chain) { #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP int i, j, id; @@ -2675,7 +2673,7 @@ static inline int lookup_chain_cache_add(struct task_struct *curr, } static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr, struct lockdep_map *lock, - struct held_lock *hlock, int chain_head, u64 chain_key) + struct held_lock *hlock, int chain_head, u64 chain_key) { /* * Trylock needs to maintain the stack of held locks, but it @@ -3032,7 +3030,7 @@ typedef int (*check_usage_f)(struct task_struct *, struct held_lock *, static int mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, - enum lock_usage_bit new_bit) + enum lock_usage_bit new_bit) { int excl_bit = exclusive_bit(new_bit); int read = new_bit & LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK; @@ -3060,7 +3058,7 @@ typedef int (*check_usage_f)(struct task_struct *, struct held_lock *, * states. */ if ((!read || !dir || STRICT_READ_CHECKS) && - !usage(curr, this, excl_bit, state_name(new_bit & ~LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK))) + !usage(curr, this, excl_bit, state_name(new_bit & ~LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK))) return 0; /* @@ -3071,8 +3069,8 @@ typedef int (*check_usage_f)(struct task_struct *, struct held_lock *, return 0; if (STRICT_READ_CHECKS && - !usage(curr, this, excl_bit + LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK, - state_name(new_bit + LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK))) + !usage(curr, this, excl_bit + LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK, + state_name(new_bit + LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK))) return 0; } @@ -3338,7 +3336,7 @@ static inline unsigned int task_irq_context(struct task_struct *task) } static int separate_irq_context(struct task_struct *curr, - struct held_lock *hlock) + struct held_lock *hlock) { unsigned int depth = curr->lockdep_depth; @@ -3364,14 +3362,14 @@ static int separate_irq_context(struct task_struct *curr, static inline int mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, - enum lock_usage_bit new_bit) + enum lock_usage_bit new_bit) { WARN_ON(1); /* Impossible innit? when we don't have TRACE_IRQFLAG */ return 1; } static inline int mark_irqflags(struct task_struct *curr, - struct held_lock *hlock) + struct held_lock *hlock) { return 1; } @@ -3382,7 +3380,7 @@ static inline unsigned int task_irq_context(struct task_struct *task) } static inline int separate_irq_context(struct task_struct *curr, - struct held_lock *hlock) + struct held_lock *hlock) { return 0; } @@ -3393,7 +3391,7 @@ static inline int separate_irq_context(struct task_struct *curr, * Mark a lock with a usage bit, and validate the state transition: */ static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, - enum lock_usage_bit new_bit) + enum lock_usage_bit new_bit) { unsigned int new_mask = 1 << new_bit, ret = 1; @@ -3836,7 +3834,7 @@ static struct held_lock *find_held_lock(struct task_struct *curr, } static int reacquire_held_locks(struct task_struct *curr, unsigned int depth, - int idx) + int idx) { struct held_lock *hlock; @@ -4210,8 +4208,8 @@ void lock_downgrade(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned long ip) * and also avoid lockdep recursion: */ void lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, - int trylock, int read, int check, - struct lockdep_map *nest_lock, unsigned long ip) + int trylock, int read, int check, + struct lockdep_map *nest_lock, unsigned long ip) { unsigned long flags; @@ -4230,8 +4228,7 @@ void lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lock_acquire); -void lock_release(struct lockdep_map *lock, int nested, - unsigned long ip) +void lock_release(struct lockdep_map *lock, int nested, unsigned long ip) { unsigned long flags; -- 1.8.3.1