Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Tianhao Zhao <tizhao@redhat.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 04/34] ipv4/route: fail early when inet dev is missing
Date:   Mon, 18 Mar 2019 10:25:28 +0100
Message-Id: <20190318084145.238752150@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190318084144.657740413@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20190318084144.657740413@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.65
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>

[ Upstream commit 22c74764aa2943ecdf9f07c900d8a9c8ba6c9265 ]

If a non local multicast packet reaches ip_route_input_rcu() while
the ingress device IPv4 private data (in_dev) is NULL, we end up
doing a NULL pointer dereference in IN_DEV_MFORWARD().

Since the later call to ip_route_input_mc() is going to fail if
!in_dev, we can fail early in such scenario and avoid the dangerous
code path.

v1 -> v2:
 - clarified the commit message, no code changes

Reported-by: Tianhao Zhao <tizhao@redhat.com>
Fixes: e58e41596811 ("net: Enable support for VRF with ipv4 multicast")
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv4/route.c |    9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -2123,12 +2123,13 @@ int ip_route_input_rcu(struct sk_buff *s
 		int our = 0;
 		int err = -EINVAL;
 
-		if (in_dev)
-			our = ip_check_mc_rcu(in_dev, daddr, saddr,
-					      ip_hdr(skb)->protocol);
+		if (!in_dev)
+			return err;
+		our = ip_check_mc_rcu(in_dev, daddr, saddr,
+				      ip_hdr(skb)->protocol);
 
 		/* check l3 master if no match yet */
-		if ((!in_dev || !our) && netif_is_l3_slave(dev)) {
+		if (!our && netif_is_l3_slave(dev)) {
 			struct in_device *l3_in_dev;
 
 			l3_in_dev = __in_dev_get_rcu(skb->dev);