Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263696AbUCVV53 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:57:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263710AbUCVV52 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:57:28 -0500 Received: from hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de ([129.187.202.12]:16590 "HELO hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263696AbUCVV5V (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:57:21 -0500 Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 22:57:09 +0100 From: Adrian Bunk To: Jos Hulzink Cc: Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: OSS: cleanup or throw away Message-ID: <20040322215709.GT16746@fs.tum.de> References: <200403221955.52767.jos@hulzink.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200403221955.52767.jos@hulzink.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1129 Lines: 35 On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 07:55:52PM +0100, Jos Hulzink wrote: > Hi, > > While fixing some "deprecated" issues in the OSS drivers, I wondered whether > this makes sense, as entire OSS is marked deprecated. Will OSS make it until > 2.7, or will it be dropped soon ? (In other words, should I take care of the > OSS drivers or not bother about them) OSS will stay in 2.6 (2.6 is a stable kernel series) but it will most likely be removed in 2.7. I wouldn't spend time to fix deprecated warnings in OSS code, such cleanups are wasted time for code that will most likely be removed in 2.7. > Best regards, > > Jos Hulzink cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/