Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] loop: access lo_backing_file only when the loop
 device is Lo_bound
To:     Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz,
        penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp
References: <1552911797-20455-1-git-send-email-dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Message-ID: <2debdd71-c444-a04b-c308-097d8e51ee4c@kernel.dk>
Date:   Mon, 18 Mar 2019 08:21:39 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1552911797-20455-1-git-send-email-dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 3/18/19 6:23 AM, Dongli Zhang wrote:
> Commit 758a58d0bc67 ("loop: set GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN after
> blkdev_reread_part()") separates "lo->lo_backing_file = NULL" and
> "lo->lo_state = Lo_unbound" into different critical regions protected by
> loop_ctl_mutex.
> 
> However, there is below race that the NULL lo->lo_backing_file would be
> accessed when the backend of a loop is another loop device, e.g., loop0's
> backend is a file, while loop1's backend is loop0.
> 
> loop0's backend is file            loop1's backend is loop0
> 
> __loop_clr_fd()
>   mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
>   lo->lo_backing_file = NULL; --> set to NULL
>   mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
>                                    loop_set_fd()
>                                      mutex_lock_killable(&loop_ctl_mutex);
>                                      loop_validate_file()
>                                        f = l->lo_backing_file; --> NULL
>                                          access if loop0 is not Lo_unbound
>   mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
>   lo->lo_state = Lo_unbound;
>   mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
> 
> lo->lo_backing_file should be accessed only when the loop device is
> Lo_bound.
> 
> In fact, the problem has been introduced already in commit 7ccd0791d985
> ("loop: Push loop_ctl_mutex down into loop_clr_fd()") after which
> loop_validate_file() could see devices in Lo_rundown state with which it
> did not count. It was harmless at that point but still.

Thanks, applied.

-- 
Jens Axboe