Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262428AbUCWKNv (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2004 05:13:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262429AbUCWKNu (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2004 05:13:50 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([207.189.100.168]:1684 "EHLO holomorphy.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262428AbUCWKNt (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2004 05:13:49 -0500 Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 02:13:23 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Paul Jackson Cc: colpatch@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mbligh@aracnet.com, akpm@osdl.org, haveblue@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] nodemask_t x86_64 changes [5/7] Message-ID: <20040323101323.GD2045@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Paul Jackson , colpatch@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mbligh@aracnet.com, akpm@osdl.org, haveblue@us.ibm.com References: <1079651082.8149.175.camel@arrakis> <20040322230850.1d8f26dc.pj@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040322230850.1d8f26dc.pj@sgi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1195 Lines: 23 On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 11:08:50PM -0800, Paul Jackson wrote: > I'll be surprised if the following line works: > nodemask_t node_offline_map = nodes_complement(node_online_map); > 1) Doesn't nodes_complement return void, and work in place? > 2) It might set bits above MAX_NUMNODES, if MAX_NUMNODES isn't a word size multiple. > I am less sure of (2) - the exact details of handling the unused bits of > a bitmask are still confusing me. But this would be one of the very > rare situations that I can find that would actually be sensitive to > possible confusions here - most places don't set bits that aren't > already set in some mask, or are careful to initialize a mask with just > set bits in select positions from 0 to MAX_NUMNODES-1. In general I attempted to model things after 3-address code. bitmap_complement() is a glaring inconsistency I wouldn't mind seeing shored up with the rest (though I guess it's only got 2 operands). -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/