Received: by 2002:ac0:bc90:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp1481858img; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 08:32:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyODMFpHiVGX8verSF1HmcvPfs/9b6xHDW32mDfxKP9r/GEqchrcedZ6pRpPvUgajUwDrkE X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6aca:: with SMTP id i10mr3069915plt.43.1553009540172; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 08:32:20 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1553009540; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KBAtMqTGkx+34j05+ASukOJIMlahODjjzGhIJtQrMF4hxraTuqIlEK9PCAIc9NGvs4 7km59LaUrwxJxG9qLZUp1U9XhDNxj0292nPLqjhztZp3zyoXZc1KIEcXhPJAmwRGpeyJ 29kxBBLYbSJ66xexUPqgE/VxwcW5MWQ/Q/hbFFhJyNwGI1qDqxgQOMxz2WIWj37u1FTX PW8bUANs77uq/QP95dAQiDcFsFKrJFndZU/+ATr9yuORfBQvh4YrGUy/EhJ+FLcfPurk OjrHROQInZXxCO7RF+a9gdMYLBJGDYbuWjspWMwfz57mSmdfbgyzODgKQepjmdtCP+Qt LN1g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=vDDyXCcVwOo4es8fRIbxoMGuyz/dmMyPzFk9UO4kDcM=; b=lAmglz3sYpdNR2Sg0xmFfv+iLPrAOoezmQkDeDlBJ5vkT+nCuaWq+zuPB+yXQ1ZA54 RKyZkHJIacWI/6+AGD4WfluNx/E5bseb15qsWcHGcxMc5x928yQ0+/aPUFGrYJgZn6/h 7EiSxdUn5ye+IJQyW2bE9Z3N3UMm3tYaEeavUntdz/ZnIPdh4/X8w42I6O+btOPDU2z1 Mee7lyBgo1r6pSsZTIhFuV8/P/b2NyXPIvodK6cjZMYbF4f84CSp7LoknkL697OP3ZF1 tRybBKK4rEVrg/Z5KPzyh2cB6XV57et56VqkTcbDszCf19/RP59tc8lQqG4d/Xm56VET ESOg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u27si11672069pgk.555.2019.03.19.08.32.04; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 08:32:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727472AbfCSPbS (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 19 Mar 2019 11:31:18 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:53938 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726876AbfCSPbS (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Mar 2019 11:31:18 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E212C1650; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 08:31:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arrakis.emea.arm.com (arrakis.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.78]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D22D03F614; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 08:31:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 15:31:14 +0000 From: Catalin Marinas To: pierre Kuo Cc: steven.price@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] initrd: move initrd_start calculate within linear mapping range check Message-ID: <20190319153114.GI59586@arrakis.emea.arm.com> References: <20190314032047.15790-1-vichy.kuo@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190314032047.15790-1-vichy.kuo@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 11:20:47AM +0800, pierre Kuo wrote: > in the previous case, initrd_start and initrd_end can be successfully > returned either (base < memblock_start_of_DRAM()) or (base + size > > memblock_start_of_DRAM() + linear_region_size). > > That means even linear mapping range check fail for initrd_start and > initrd_end, it still can get virtual address. Here we put > initrd_start/initrd_end to be calculated only when linear mapping check > pass. > > Fixes: c756c592e442 ("arm64: Utilize phys_initrd_start/phys_initrd_size") For future versions, please also cc the author of the original commit you are fixing. > Reviewed-by: Steven Price > Signed-off-by: pierre Kuo > --- > Changes in v2: > - add Fixes tag > > arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 8 +++----- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c > index 7205a9085b4d..1adf418de685 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c > @@ -425,6 +425,9 @@ void __init arm64_memblock_init(void) > memblock_remove(base, size); /* clear MEMBLOCK_ flags */ > memblock_add(base, size); > memblock_reserve(base, size); > + /* the generic initrd code expects virtual addresses */ > + initrd_start = __phys_to_virt(phys_initrd_start); > + initrd_end = initrd_start + phys_initrd_size; > } > } > > @@ -450,11 +453,6 @@ void __init arm64_memblock_init(void) > * pagetables with memblock. > */ > memblock_reserve(__pa_symbol(_text), _end - _text); > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD) && phys_initrd_size) { > - /* the generic initrd code expects virtual addresses */ > - initrd_start = __phys_to_virt(phys_initrd_start); > - initrd_end = initrd_start + phys_initrd_size; > - } With CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE we can get a further change to memstart_addr after the place where you moved the initrd_{start,end} setting, which would result in a different value for __phys_to_virt(phys_initrd_start). -- Catalin