Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 19 Mar 2019 09:40:07 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To:     Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
        Christian =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
        Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] HMM updates for 5.1
Message-Id: <20190319094007.a47ce9222b5faacec3e96da4@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190318170404.GA6786@redhat.com>
References: <20190129165428.3931-1-jglisse@redhat.com>
        <20190313012706.GB3402@redhat.com>
        <20190313091004.b748502871ba0aa839b924e9@linux-foundation.org>
        <20190318170404.GA6786@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 13:04:04 -0400 Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 09:10:04AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 21:27:06 -0400 Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Andrew you will not be pushing this patchset in 5.1 ?
> > 
> > I'd like to.  It sounds like we're converging on a plan.
> > 
> > It would be good to hear more from the driver developers who will be
> > consuming these new features - links to patchsets, review feedback,
> > etc.  Which individuals should we be asking?  Felix, Christian and
> > Jason, perhaps?
> > 
> 
> So i am guessing you will not send this to Linus ?

I was waiting to see how the discussion proceeds.  Was also expecting
various changelog updates (at least) - more acks from driver
developers, additional pointers to client driver patchsets, description
of their readiness, etc.

Today I discover that Alex has cherrypicked "mm/hmm: use reference
counting for HMM struct" into a tree which is fed into linux-next which
rather messes things up from my end and makes it hard to feed a
(possibly modified version of) that into Linus.

So I think I'll throw up my hands, drop them all and shall await
developments :(