Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Cc:     robh@kernel.org, dalias@libc.org, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp,
        dan.j.williams@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        sbates@raithlin.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
References: <mhng-96f28491-e123-459a-b09c-88732de06bbf@palmer-si-x1c4>
From:   Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Message-ID: <c9f13314-204b-10a5-e9eb-2c4d8fca6c90@deltatee.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Mar 2019 11:56:52 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <mhng-96f28491-e123-459a-b09c-88732de06bbf@palmer-si-x1c4>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-CA
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] sh: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hey Palmer,

On 2019-01-23 12:56 p.m., Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> @Palmer: if you can just look at taking the second patch, I'll resubmit
>> the first one to the appropriate list.
> 
> Works for me.  I'll queue the second patch into my staging branch, targeted for
> the next merge window.

It doesn't look like my sparesmem patch made it into v5.1-rc1. Did it
fall through the cracks?

Thanks,

Logan