Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 19 Mar 2019 20:25:50 +0100
From:   Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To:     Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Cc:     bhelgaas@google.com, austin_bolen@dell.com,
        alex_gagniuc@dellteam.com, keith.busch@intel.com,
        Shyam_Iyer@Dell.com, okaya@kernel.org,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/LINK: bw_notification: Do not leave interrupt
 handler NULL
Message-ID: <20190319192550.5lxfm3h2jnaip3on@wunner.de>
References: <CAHk-=wgM-5WfPW9LNHGfc1RxjVbDvHZqNfxyLVRSPP0R4jetDg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190319011214.7847-1-mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190319011214.7847-1-mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 08:12:04PM -0500, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
> A threaded IRQ with a NULL handler does not work with level-triggered
> interrupts. request_threaded_irq() will return an error:
> 
>   genirq: Threaded irq requested with handler=NULL and !ONESHOT for irq 16
>   pcie_bw_notification: probe of 0000:00:1b.0:pcie010 failed with error -22
> 
> For level interrupts we need to silence the interrupt before exiting
> the IRQ handler, so just clear the PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_LBMS bit there.
> 
> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>

I've tested this on my Ivy Bridge MacBook Pro which uses INTx on root and
downstream ports and I'm not seeing probe errors, so:

Tested-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>


> @@ -67,8 +77,8 @@ static irqreturn_t pcie_bw_notification_handler(int irq, void *context)
>  		__pcie_print_link_status(dev, false);
>  	up_read(&pci_bus_sem);
>  
> +	pcie_capability_read_word(port, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &link_status);
>  	pcie_update_link_speed(port->subordinate, link_status);
> -	pcie_capability_write_word(port, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, events);
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }

I'd suggest leaving the call to pcie_update_link_speed() in
pcie_bw_notification_irq() to avoid the duplicate read of the
Link Status register.

With that addressed,
Reviewed-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>

Thanks,

Lukas