Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 19 Mar 2019 14:38:24 -0700
From:   Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     kan.liang@linux.intel.com, acme@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, jolsa@kernel.org,
        eranian@google.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/22] perf/x86/intel: Support adaptive PEBSv4
Message-ID: <20190319213824.GY24002@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
References: <20190318214144.4639-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
 <20190318214144.4639-4-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
 <20190319144748.GH5996@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190319144748.GH5996@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

> How much work would intel_pmu_drain_pebs_icl() be?
> 
> I'm thinking that might not be terrible.

I had it in an early version of the code, but it ended up with a lot 
of code duplication.

-Andi