Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262609AbUCWQB3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:01:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262623AbUCWQB3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:01:29 -0500 Received: from poros.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.44]:51882 "EHLO poros.telenet-ops.be") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262609AbUCWQB1 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:01:27 -0500 From: Jan De Luyck To: Sven Luther Subject: Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Re: [PATCH] Sysfs for framebuffer Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 17:01:16 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Kronos , Linux Fbdev development list , Andrew Morton References: <20040320174956.GA3177@dreamland.darkstar.lan> <200403231211.09334.lkml@kcore.org> <20040323122627.GA22830@lambda> In-Reply-To: <20040323122627.GA22830@lambda> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200403231701.19786.lkml@kcore.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1464 Lines: 45 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 23 March 2004 13:26, Sven Luther wrote: > > - From a users point of view: if there are only to be framebuffer devices > > listed in this class, why not call it just what it is: "Framebuffer" ? > > Naming it after something it is only in a broad sense makes no sense to > > me. I'd be looking in /sys/.../framebuffer instead of /sys/.../graphics > > or /display. > > Notice that /display is what is used by most OF implementations, so this > kinda makes sense. I would vote like BenH on this if i was consulted. OF implementations? > > > Display would be the EDID info of my screen (physical), and graphics... > > well... I'd half expect something like capture cards to be there... > > But this also makes sense, still, i guess we are concerned with more > info than just the framebuffer, right ? Yup. What's in a name indeed. But one might try to make it as non-confusing as possible. Kind regards, Jan De Luyck - -- Anything is possible on paper. -- Ron McAfee -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAYF9OUQQOfidJUwQRAlUCAJ9gevHf51xYtw7Zu4PAAI3Lq+VvJgCbByUB c2zgx+ZzG9zKZo/9Lslr76s= =zzhB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/