Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 19 Mar 2019 19:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:     Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] sh: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper
In-Reply-To: <c9f13314-204b-10a5-e9eb-2c4d8fca6c90@deltatee.com>
CC:     robh@kernel.org, dalias@libc.org, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp,
        dan.j.williams@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        sbates@raithlin.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
From:   Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
To:     logang@deltatee.com
Message-ID: <mhng-bc5a03c7-1387-43e2-bd72-fb03e344e196@palmer-si-x1c4>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (MHng)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 10:56:52 PDT (-0700), logang@deltatee.com wrote:
> Hey Palmer,
>
> On 2019-01-23 12:56 p.m., Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>> @Palmer: if you can just look at taking the second patch, I'll resubmit
>>> the first one to the appropriate list.
>>
>> Works for me.  I'll queue the second patch into my staging branch, targeted for
>> the next merge window.
>
> It doesn't look like my sparesmem patch made it into v5.1-rc1. Did it
> fall through the cracks?

It must have, sorry.  Is this what you're referring to?

    https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10754911/