Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 20 Mar 2019 08:26:05 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     George Hilliard <thirtythreeforty@gmail.com>
Cc:     linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: your mail
Message-ID: <20190320072605.GA32121@kroah.com>
References: <20190319022012.11051-1-thirtythreeforty@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190319022012.11051-1-thirtythreeforty@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 08:20:01PM -0600, George Hilliard wrote:
> Because of this change, the driver now expects a pinctrl device
> reference in the mmc controller's device tree node; without it, it will
> bail out.  This could break existing setups that don't specify it
> because it "just worked" up until now.  So currently I just let the old
> behavior fall away because this is a staging driver.  But if this is a
> problem, the old behavior could be added back as a fallback.
> 
> This is version 2 of a patchset that I requested feedback for about a
> month ago.  Please review as if they are a new patchset; all the patches
> were rebased several times and a couple new correctness fixes added.
> 
> The TODO list is largely unchanged, aside from the couple of TODO
> comments in the code that I have addressed.  Ultimately, I think this
> driver could potentially be merged with the "real" mtk-mmc driver as the
> TODO suggests, but someone who is more familiar with the IP core will
> have to do that.  Mediatek documentation (that I can find) is very
> sparse.
> 
> This is ready to merge if there is no other feedback!
> 
> >From George Hilliard <thirtythreeforty@gmail.com> # This line is ignored.
> From: George Hilliard <thirtythreeforty@gmail.com>
> Reply-To: 
> Subject: [PATCH v2 00/11] mt7621-mmc: Various correctness fixes
> In-Reply-To: 
> 
> 

No subject for this email?