Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 20 Mar 2019 17:36:49 +0000
From:   Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To:     Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Cc:     <christoffer.dall@arm.com>, <james.morse@arm.com>,
        <julien.thierry@arm.com>, <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
        <andre.przywara@arm.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] KVM: arm: vgic: Make two functions static
Message-ID: <20190320173649.32de4908@why.wild-wind.fr.eu.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190320141813.10380-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
References: <20190320141813.10380-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Organization: ARM Ltd
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 22:18:13 +0800
Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> wrote:

> From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
> 
> Fix sparse warnings:
> 
> arch/arm64/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c:1732:5: warning:
>  symbol 'vgic_its_has_attr_regs' was not declared. Should it be static?
> arch/arm64/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c:1753:5: warning:
>  symbol 'vgic_its_attr_regs_access' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>

Applied with a small tweak to the subject line.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.