Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Cc:     robh@kernel.org, dalias@libc.org, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sbates@raithlin.com,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        dan.j.williams@intel.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
References: <mhng-bc5a03c7-1387-43e2-bd72-fb03e344e196@palmer-si-x1c4>
From:   Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Message-ID: <9ac29b0d-4c25-3f5c-3812-44b42332447d@deltatee.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Mar 2019 11:43:09 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <mhng-bc5a03c7-1387-43e2-bd72-fb03e344e196@palmer-si-x1c4>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-CA
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] sh: mm: make use of new memblocks_present() helper
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On 2019-03-19 8:54 p.m., Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 10:56:52 PDT (-0700), logang@deltatee.com wrote:
>> Hey Palmer,
>>
>> On 2019-01-23 12:56 p.m., Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>>> @Palmer: if you can just look at taking the second patch, I'll resubmit
>>>> the first one to the appropriate list.
>>>
>>> Works for me.  I'll queue the second patch into my staging branch, targeted for
>>> the next merge window.
>>
>> It doesn't look like my sparesmem patch made it into v5.1-rc1. Did it
>> fall through the cracks?
> 
> It must have, sorry.  Is this what you're referring to?
> 
>     https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10754911/

Yes, though it conflicts with v5.1-rc1 due to some code reorganization.

I've updated it and we will submit it later this week as part of a
larger patch set which helps enable p2p on RISC-V.

Logan