Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 20 Mar 2019 15:42:18 -0400
From:   Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qais.yousef@arm.com,
        dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, linux@manojrajarao.com, ast@kernel.org,
        atishp04@gmail.com, dancol@google.com,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, karim.yaghmour@opersys.com,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, kernel-team@android.com,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
        mhiramat@kernel.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, yhs@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] Provide in-kernel headers to make extending
 kernel easier
Message-ID: <20190320194218.GA80310@google.com>
References: <20190320163116.39275-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>
 <20190320113111.d68a7c71c2c163bbc7d5f6aa@linux-foundation.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190320113111.d68a7c71c2c163bbc7d5f6aa@linux-foundation.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 11:31:11AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 12:31:14 -0400 "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:
> 
> > Introduce in-kernel headers and other artifacts which are made available
> > as an archive through proc (/proc/kheaders.tar.xz file).
> 
> Lazyass here hasn't been following the recent review discussion and is
> going to try cheating.  Are there significant outstanding concerns now,
> or are we good to go?

Looks to me like it is pretty solid. v4->v5 was just cosmetic changes,
rebasing etc. Unless Masahiro has any other concerns, it could be a
linux-next candidate. I tested it quite heavily, but would be nice to get
some linux-next testing as well.

thanks,

 - Joel