Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 4772960159
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] usb: typec: fusb302: Make fusb302_irq_work static
To:     Yue Haibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>, linux@roeck-us.net,
        heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
References: <20190320141202.19452-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
From:   Mukesh Ojha <mojha@codeaurora.org>
Message-ID: <43561c26-2d17-7237-e887-ddea7d992aab@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Thu, 21 Mar 2019 01:21:50 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190320141202.19452-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


On 3/20/2019 7:42 PM, Yue Haibing wrote:
> From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
>
> Fix sparse warning:
>
> drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/fusb302.c:1454:6: warning:
>   symbol 'fusb302_irq_work' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
> ---
>   drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/fusb302.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/fusb302.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/fusb302.c
> index 261b829..457fe7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/fusb302.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/fusb302.c
> @@ -1451,7 +1451,7 @@ static irqreturn_t fusb302_irq_intn(int irq, void *dev_id)
>   	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>   }
>   
> -void fusb302_irq_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +static void fusb302_irq_work(struct work_struct *work)
>   {
>   	struct fusb302_chip *chip = container_of(work, struct fusb302_chip,
>   						 irq_work);


Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@codeaurora.org>