Received: by 2002:ac0:bc90:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id a16csp41281img; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 13:34:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwlnkkhvCddE55PZfxWRlWydHnwtmF3l6tkBOfcWGOjOwzsYPKSbm49dcOqd3PWDT2Xq0rL X-Received: by 2002:a63:2b03:: with SMTP id r3mr8946539pgr.1.1553114069064; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 13:34:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1553114069; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Law/hgwyIqQqnEQ5+kzPzT3iHIKeqnC89uYh9FircT4k/0grmSSLQQKgOsW2RrjbHF nbDlyUhFlNpoJiL1BEcX9P5E37iu1AKixX0ymDZlkAsOsgm8Xis8CGS+jVYCK0K4vocY ZNarXcefH1wDUxi3cd0L9G5UXP04FH42FMCz8RuLyt+3XGzaH17pxvW5OkILRhRXuB7T 1LHvfnnjUPwXrR5dELNE9GUC3qs+2qG7dE2OLFxJUmSiStvcfeIgevYXWwF7XkmLLyGW +4L0FjoTHg3q4yAlLOP8mSgYrZ/polR71CRtz+nKVtybkDsu15IxwuRmj4m4kfggsAJJ YEyA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=UPlC6o40QrK8th/8A2yES50PTjvMDGZGDPJYtGmXeJw=; b=O/Rew1glY1Pghx2CLCs2zBeuHxY4pIwaJW8rsT6/78a+oyAsoq2GASsPV69PY4z0qR 7PS35jKul+aWjKdP9unTDaqzakG79+be5nT7jKya/VCDwU98ydXpevWbzPMS1XYOywz/ rV7H08BJvXo8sf5b1+dtChEtfwrx9EiuNfGbgDKzjGx7rDNastVxlJWefFLWJmOfga2b ONdU8ARlyfYhUzd4gwwGOgmdHg/vF2Jo32zJCWAkF6dtutaNJnLCwgErLVKRl0Sb5Ssz USfSiIjrZ/YJCyrYrHmy/cePGqz8em9uSByxmx7UYC9wwLsSnLsk90PtevPHW10FpL8s X7sg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f21si2575321plr.297.2019.03.20.13.34.13; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 13:34:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727414AbfCTUca (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 20 Mar 2019 16:32:30 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:57440 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726739AbfCTUca (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Mar 2019 16:32:30 -0400 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 33D222192C; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 20:32:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 16:32:27 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Tom Zanussi Cc: Pali =?UTF-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?= , Mario Limonciello , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: dell_smbios KASAN bug Message-ID: <20190320163227.3aa924c2@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <1553113736.2015.2.camel@gmail.com> References: <1553106560.2080.5.camel@gmail.com> <20190320144146.08ecd5e4@gandalf.local.home> <1553108749.2079.1.camel@gmail.com> <20190320151353.1a223c0e@gandalf.local.home> <1553110221.2034.1.camel@gmail.com> <20190320154534.46ebab51@gandalf.local.home> <1553113736.2015.2.camel@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 15:28:56 -0500 Tom Zanussi wrote: > > > Unfortunately, no. > > > > That's really weird. I would recommend throwing in a bunch of printks > > to see if things are being freed and set, to make sure this code is > > hit > > and something else isn't just corrupting it. > > > > Actually the patch does make the KASAN bug go away - I'm so used to > building without modules that I forgot to rebuild the module after > applying the patch, sigh. I wasn't about to say anything. That's why I suggested adding printks and trying it again ;-) -- Steve